Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

That USA game was pretty epic.

"I am Kansas" -Smeagol
http://heythats.cool

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

USA: 1 Algeria: 0. USA wins group, UK is runner up, but advances.

http://tinyurl.com/krwj4ek
http://tinyurl.com/kvxr6umhttp://tinyurl.com/kxofj4mhttp://tinyurl.com/k5fw3syhttp://tinyurl.com/m4rv8tf

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

Night Owl wrote:

I had to see snippets of it interspersed with the other one. Really happy about the win, though.

Haha; the Dutch channel (which broadcasted both matches on the public channels 1 and 2) showed part of the other match every time something important happened, something which was really confusing yesterday as when I was watching Argentinia vs Greece, everybody suddenly was either black or asian. SO confusing.

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

JUGGERNAUT PICTURES wrote:

USA: 1 Algeria: 0. USA wins group, UK is runner up, but advances.

It's England actually mini/tongue

PS: Well done U.S.A you played good.

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/Chuppa/Signatures/sig1.png

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

Yeah, England wins the group..

Hm, maybe not..

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

No, England is runner up, not UK. mini/wink

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

The US deserved that win. Two bad calls went against them and if they had lost out because of those calls... Well done to them.

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/jamit/LAMLradioEps/sig.gifhttp://www.majhost.com/gallery/jamit/LAMLradioEps/sig2.gif

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

JUGGERNAUT PICTURES wrote:

USA: 1 Algeria: 0. USA wins group, UK is runner up, but advances.

Some one needs to learn some geography.

I cant believe that England only just stayed in, come on its the easiest group I have ever seen. And how the hell did the USA get the same number of points as England? If the US can get a goal against Algeria I would assume England could do the same if not better. Oh well I just hope that being runner up works in our favour, though I doubt  we will last long if we couldn't even beat  Algeria or the US.

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

TDogg186 wrote:

though I doubt  we will last long if we couldn't even beat  Algeria or the US.

Cheer up, you've still got France.

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/jamit/LAMLradioEps/sig.gifhttp://www.majhost.com/gallery/jamit/LAMLradioEps/sig2.gif

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

TDogg186 wrote:
JUGGERNAUT PICTURES wrote:

USA: 1 Algeria: 0. USA wins group, UK is runner up, but advances.

Some one needs to learn some geography.

I cant believe that England only just stayed in, come on its the easiest group I have ever seen. And how the hell did the USA get the same number of points as England? If the US can get a goal against Algeria I would assume England could do the same if not better. Oh well I just hope that being runner up works in our favour, though I doubt  we will last long if we couldn't even beat  Algeria or the US.

You still cant accept the fact that the US might just be a good football team can you?

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

Stoppedmotion wrote:
TDogg186 wrote:
JUGGERNAUT PICTURES wrote:

USA: 1 Algeria: 0. USA wins group, UK is runner up, but advances.

Some one needs to learn some geography.

I cant believe that England only just stayed in, come on its the easiest group I have ever seen. And how the hell did the USA get the same number of points as England? If the US can get a goal against Algeria I would assume England could do the same if not better. Oh well I just hope that being runner up works in our favour, though I doubt  we will last long if we couldn't even beat  Algeria or the US.

You still cant accept the fact that the US might just be a good football team can you?

That's because there not good. I have been watching them play and i haven't seen any skill on there part. There main tactic seems to be just defending. Anyone who thinks the US is good must have been looking away from the screen through every game they played.

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

TDogg186 wrote:

That's because there not good. I have been watching them play and i haven't seen any skill on there part. There main tactic seems to be just defending. Anyone who thinks the US is good must have been looking away from the screen through every game they played.

There[sic] main tactic seems to be just defending.

So I take it you haven't watched their match against Algeria, then?

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

TDogg186 wrote:

My prediction is that England beats the USA something like 5-1.
Then We beat Algeria 6-0.
And finally Slovenia gets a bit lucky and only looses 7-2.

I think Argentina is going to try to make an example of us this year. You know with all this Falkland oil stuff going on, they know they cant beat the UK at war so they go for the second best thing and try to beat England at football. I feel like there's going to be a lot of national pride involved with that game. It will be the one to watch.

I think this has already been said but since the US won the group

http://www.flashpointsocialmedia.com/Area51/Orion/Images/o_rly.jpg

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

Donovan is God.

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH.

TDogg who cares if we only just qualified, the real competition starts now mini/bigsmile and besides, past world cup winners usually do crap in group stages. Have faith.

We have germany next. Going to be a pretty epic game.

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

Having watched the US matches, they're doing strangely well. Good team.

11:41 Hazzat NO FUN ALLOWED IN BRICKFILMING COMMUNITY

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

Stoppedmotion wrote:

I think this has already been said but since the US won the group

*facepalm* They got the same number of points as England thus they didn't do any better.

Rsteenoven wrote:

TDogg who cares if we only just qualified, the real competition starts now mini/bigsmile and besides, past world cup winners usually do crap in group stages. Have faith.

Good point. mini/bigsmile

Just_a_Minifig wrote:

Having watched the US matches, they're doing strangely well. Good team.

No there not. The only explanation I have for why the European teams are doing badly is because of the heat. I believe the American team probably spent the last 3 years training in Texas or somewhere. Anyway the US team is not doing well their just not giving up after 45 minutes like everyone else.

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

It seems like they give the number of goals priority over margin percentage, which actually seems preety stupid. It means a team that team that won a game 10-9 would be positioned above a team that won 9-0. So, yeah, the US didn't win their group, they tied with England.

Also, I don't think it's that hot in South Africa in the middle of Winter.

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

Actually, the U.S. did win the group, not England. And U.S.A does deserve to win the group. All U.S.A needed to do was win, & the group is theirs. They did, so live with what happened, not with what should have happened.

http://tinyurl.com/krwj4ek
http://tinyurl.com/kvxr6umhttp://tinyurl.com/kxofj4mhttp://tinyurl.com/k5fw3syhttp://tinyurl.com/m4rv8tf

Re: Official 2010 FIFA World Cup Discussion Thread

We are drawing you numpties

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/Chuppa/Signatures/sig1.png