Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

He's Batman.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bnhzak2CMAAmX8Z.jpg:large

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

I love the new bat mobile design, I always thought Nolan's wasn't right for the character.

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

I still don't think Afleck is really the best guy to play Batty, but he still looks cool enough.

I like the costume design, It seems more grey rather than black which gives it a bit of a classic Batman vibe to it, though, I'm a bit annoyed with how stubby his ears are, and I would prefer a less bulky build for Batman, something that looks more nimble.

I'm looking forward to it, though.

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

Squid wrote:

and I would prefer a less bulky build for Batman, something that looks more nimble.

Nimble? Really?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Adam_West_Batman_1965.JPG

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

Batman's been on steroids! So much so that his ears have shrunk...

Mod edit: Please don't blaspheme, some people on the site are religious.

YouTube
Max, She/Her

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

I like the shorter ears. They remind me of the 60s Batman (see above), and they just make more tactical sense to me. Like, have those long ears is just asking for someone to grab them.

I do think he's a bit too beefy, as he looks like Frank Miller Batman, but this may just be a test photo and they'll change that later.

https://i.imgur.com/gGaR9Oz.png
Youtube @TheRealSonjira I consider it a personal defeat if my pee is not perfectly clear every time.]

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

I don't dislike this suit, its just different from other film-versions of Batman - which isn't a bad thing...its just a bit of a shock.

Its like if I came home one day to find my house had been transformed into a fashionable condo. Its not a bad change, its just a bit of a surprise.

YouTube
Max, She/Her

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

Am I the only person who loves this new design? The Adam West-ish suit is great, and a far cry from Bale (which a new Batman will need to be for the reboot to be taken seriously) and I love that gothic Batmobile. I'm slightly more optimistic about Man of Steel II now. I'm intrigued to see how Cyborg and Wonder Woman fit into all of this.

For the record, I absolutely adore Man of Steel and think it's a science-fiction masterpiece, but I'm worried about how the sequel will be done. I don't trust Synder as far as I can throw an owl.

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/ZoefDeHaas/stuff/sig1.png
"Nothing goes down 'less I'm involved. No nuggets. No onion rings. No nothin'. A cheeseburger gets sold in the park, I want in! You got fat while we starved on the streets...now it's my turn!" -Harley Morenstein

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

The amount of muscle he has bulked up seems rather impressive, but it seems like too much.  He looks tough and threatening, but he doesn't look like he would be good at dodging.  He seemed just about the right body shape in Argo, though.

Also, I just happened to finally be able to see Man of Steel today, and I enjoyed it.

jampot wrote:

I don't trust Synder as far as I can throw an owl.

Theoretically you could throw and owl very, very far.
The owl might be able to catch itself and fly before it hits the ground and may fly some before landing, thus it could potentially be thrown much further than most objects one might throw.
However, of course, it is possible that counting the flight of the owl as part of the "throw" might be a bit of a stretch as the owl would be then moving by its own flight rather than one's own original throw, so it really does depend upon the way one does classify the throw.

However, an owl, like any other reasonably sized object, could be thrown an infinite distance through the void of space.
Unless, however, the Cosmos will only exist for a finite amount of time, in which case the owl could only be thrown to go along until the Cosmos's final doom.

(Okay, I'm done)

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

jampot wrote:

I don't trust Synder as far as I can throw an owl.

I see what you did there...

"I wear black even when I'm not animating. I'm like a walking funeral parlor."
-PushOverProductions

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

I like it. I think it looks pretty much how a Batsuit should look and how it was really expected to look. My only complaint is the shape of the actual symbol; it seems just extremely thick. It shouldn’t be as sleek and slender as the Nolan Bat-symbol, but this just seems way too big. Just a minor nitpick though.

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

Chris W. wrote:

My only complaint is the shape of the actual symbol; it seems just extremely thick. It shouldn’t be as sleek and slender as the Nolan Bat-symbol, but this just seems way too big. Just a minor nitpick though.

Fatman vs. Superman.

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

The symbol is thick because THIS IS BATMAN ON RRROOOOIIIIIDDDDDSSSSSSSS.

The only problem I have with this design is that I can't imagine Batman's voice being any more dignified than Bale's. I mean...look at the guy. Can you imagine him having a slow, deep, calculating voice? OR CAN YOU IMAGINE HIM YELLING EVERY LINE WHILST THROWING STUFF!!

YouTube
Max, She/Her

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

Squid wrote:
jampot wrote:

I don't trust Synder as far as I can throw an owl.

Theoretically you could throw and owl very, very far.
The owl might be able to catch itself and fly before it hits the ground and may fly some before landing, thus it could potentially be thrown much further than most objects one might throw.
However, of course, it is possible that counting the flight of the owl as part of the "throw" might be a bit of a stretch as the owl would be then moving by its own flight rather than one's own original throw, so it really does depend upon the way one does classify the throw.

However, an owl, like any other reasonably sized object, could be thrown an infinite distance through the void of space.
Unless, however, the Cosmos will only exist for a finite amount of time, in which case the owl could only be thrown to go along until the Cosmos's final doom.

(Okay, I'm done)

This totally made my morning.

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/ZoefDeHaas/stuff/sig1.png
"Nothing goes down 'less I'm involved. No nuggets. No onion rings. No nothin'. A cheeseburger gets sold in the park, I want in! You got fat while we starved on the streets...now it's my turn!" -Harley Morenstein

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

So #sadbatman has become a thing...

YouTube
Max, She/Her

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,

The official title
http://media.comicbook.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/dawn-of-justice-logo.png

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

And that...that is such a naff title.

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/ZoefDeHaas/stuff/sig1.png
"Nothing goes down 'less I'm involved. No nuggets. No onion rings. No nothin'. A cheeseburger gets sold in the park, I want in! You got fat while we starved on the streets...now it's my turn!" -Harley Morenstein

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

It's as if there's supposed to be multiple Batman V Superman movies.

https://i.imgur.com/4b9NnS3.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/GUIl0qk.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/ox64uld.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/v3iyhE5.png

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

2014: More fan serviced super hero movies mini/rolleyes
2015: Kids born before 2002 will want to know Who's Ant-Man?
2016: Super Hero movies become the plague of cinema as FPS games are the plague of gaming.

A Life? Cool! Where can I download one of those from?

Re: NEW: Superman and Batman movie (Man of Steel Sequel)

I feel kinda weird that verses is shown as just V rather than "Vs.".
But still, I'm glad this had a title.

I guess a subtitle is good just in case someone goes off and makes another movie with Batman and Superman in 30 years or something.