Bricks in Motion
We are a friendly filmmaking community devoted to the art of stop-motion animation using LEGO® and similar construction toys. Here, you can share your work, join our community of other brickfilmers, and participate in periodic animation contests!
A place to discuss, share, and create stop motion films.
Ad
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
I'm not canon savvy, but is there a real difference in the t3i when compared to the t2i for brickfilming in general? (not that brickfilming will be the sole purpose of the camera). I understand that the t3i has a rotating LCD screen, and can have a mic plugged into it, but is there any real difference in the quality? Can one take a lens that the other cannot?
@Mason - Both take the exact same lenses I believe. The T3i wasn't much of a change as far as image quality goes, but the T3i was a step up for videographers. The flip out LCD screen was a wonderful addition but there were other things added for movie mode that allowed greater control over things, including greater control of audio I think. An external microphone could already be plugged into the T2i, so that was not a change. The cameras have the same sensor I believe and same MP count (if that kind of thing interests you). Be aware that the T4i is about to come out. It's $1,100 I believe and is a bigger step up, but it should hopefully reduce the price of the T3i and T2i.
The T4i is actually already released, and the changes were very, very minor.
The biggest one was the image processor, which is now capable of capturing 5 fps continuously
Also, it sports continuous, silent auto focus during video.
I just recently talked to the owner of a Canon store, and here's the difference between the T2i, T3i, and T4i. For still images (brickfilming and the main use for DSLR's) the T2i and the T3i are exactly the same; the T4i is quite better. The biggest difference is in video. The T3i (an awkward step in between the T2i and T4i) was made for a reason. The T2i has a tendency to overheat when used for video for a little while, 30 minutes or so of constant shooting. The T3i addressed this problem and added the flip out screen, (seriously worth it for live action video and animation if you don't use a capture program). The T4i maintains the flip out screen and has a very major improvement for video; the T4i contains an interior focusing system that allows for constant, smooth auto focusing during filming. It also comes kitted with a new lens with a special silent auto focusing system. The T4i with that lens is a massive improvement over the T2i for video. ZP, that isn't minor if you're shooting anything but an interview.
True.
I was looking at rumors and such a while before the release, and it was supposed to have a 24MP sensor.
On the release night, I stayed up and watched the launch, and when I saw the 18MP sensor, I was a little disappointed, but glad that I had gotten the T3i for cheap, considering the few improvements.
As for the auto focus, I only use manual focus in video, so I see no real need for it.
The most exciting thing for me was the 40mm pancake lens, which I am going to get as soon as the buzz dies down.
I hadn't heard anything about that, weirdest lens I have ever seen. From what I can tell it seems like a pretty good lens, although it really only seems useful in very specific situations.
I don't know too much about optics, but I do know about fstop, and the corresponding aperture size.
The shorter lens has a low fstop (2.0) which means that the aperture will be very large, thus letting more light in.
This is better for anything where you have limited lights, and it also gives a very shallow DOF, making it good for portraits.
I hadn't heard anything about that, weirdest lens I have ever seen. From what I can tell it seems like a pretty good lens, although it really only seems useful in very specific situations.
What specific situations would those be?
I don't know too much about optics, but I do know about fstop, and the corresponding aperture size.
The shorter lens has a low fstop (2.0) which means that the aperture will be very large, thus letting more light in.
This is better for anything where you have limited lights, and it also gives a very shallow DOF, making it good for portraits.
The 2.8 f/stop is nice, but I would save up another $200 for the EF 50mm f/1.4 USM for the even lower f/stop and much better USM focusing system. After using USM lenses, it's hard to go back to a lesser focusing system. I have read some good stuff about it's image quality though. I have to say that it seems like a pretty good lens. I might consider it but I already have an f/1.8 lens, and just spent $800 on a standard zoom lens.
Minor bump.
I currently have a Logitech C910 webcam but I've been looking at getting a DSLR.
Would this camera be a good brickfilming camera?
Should be good.
If you had the extra cash, I would get the 60D, because it has more features for photography.
I was also in BestBuy yesterday, and they had all the Rebel line on display. I finely got to hold the 60D, and I know why everyone likes it. It has a larger grip then the other cameras, and it just feels more solid in almost every way.
If you were planning to do video also, go with the 600D, because it is cheaper, and is better then the 60D for video.
The 650D is a minor improvement, with the most significant changes being the addition of a touch screen, and the ability to constantly focus during video.
The Canon T2i is $560 refurbished, with the kit lens. Only $60 more than what you are considering, but with much better features and quality. Of course, the lens is not so good, but will easily get the job done.
I'm not so sure.
I use the 18-55 kit lens for 90% of my shooting, and it hasn't failed me yet. It is a good size, has a reasonably small aperture, and the build quality is very premium. If you were to invest in another lens, however, get the 18-135. It is an amazing all-purpose lens, and when I had it, I never took it off the camera.
I've got a question that's not about what you're talking about now, but I have to know this: does somebody know if the Sony Alpha A37 supports tethered shooting, so I can use it for stopmotion? Thank you!
I have the Samsung NX10, and I wondered if anyone has used it for animation? I dont have the money to invest in a new camera (I have the C910 if this is worse) as I have invested in Sony Vegas Pro 11 and a Samsung Galaxy S3 
I will get a remote to it. Is it good, or should I get a specific lens for best quality? I'm new to D-SLR's as I have always used webcams for animating.
I'm not so sure.
I use the 18-55 kit lens for 90% of my shooting, and it hasn't failed me yet. It is a good size, has a reasonably small aperture, and the build quality is very premium. If you were to invest in another lens, however, get the 18-135. It is an amazing all-purpose lens, and when I had it, I never took it off the camera.
Don't get me wrong; the 18-55 is a great standard zoom lens. The only thing is that, typically, for most "consumer" DSLRs, the 18-55 lens is a quick (and cheap) way for manufacturers to get the consumer drooling. Of course it's a good lens. It's simply not the best. Whether or not you decide to keep it is your choice as the 18-55 can be a useful tool for general purposes.
As far as 18-135mm lenses go, from what I've heard they are superb. I have read reviews on some lenses, however, where there is some noticeable chromatic aberration when zoomed in fully and the aperture is wide-open; but this should be expected with most far-length zooms.
I've got a question that's not about what you're talking about now, but I have to know this: does somebody know if the Sony Alpha A37 supports tethered shooting, so I can use it for stopmotion? Thank you!
I've owned the Sony NEX-5 and Sony a55. Both cameras were not supported in StopMotion Pro and Dragonframe, and I don't think they will work with other third-party animation software. Unfortunately I think the only way to have tethered shooting with Sony DSLRs is to purchase a USB-to-video cable for about $45. There do not seem to be many Sony users in the stop-motion community, but I'm sure you'll find a way soon. 
I've owned the Sony NEX-5 and Sony a55. Both cameras were not supported in StopMotion Pro and Dragonframe, and I don't think they will work with other third-party animation software. Unfortunately I think the only way to have tethered shooting with Sony DSLRs is to purchase a USB-to-video cable for about $45. There do not seem to be many Sony users in the stop-motion community, but I'm sure you'll find a way soon.
Thank you for your answer! I just got a mail from Sony in which they said that the Sony A37 doesn't support tethered shooting. Now I've got the Nikon D5100 and this camera works.
Last edited by Creator Productions (July 11, 2012 (01:22pm))
Glad I could be of some assistance! When you get the chance, tell me how the Nikon works in tethered shooting --- is it similar to Canon's EOS "Live View?" Also, just out of curiosity, what capture program are you using?
Glad I could be of some assistance! When you get the chance, tell me how the Nikon works in tethered shooting --- is it similar to Canon's EOS "Live View?" Also, just out of curiosity, what capture program are you using?
It works similar to Canon's Live View, but Nikon doesn't supply software in the box, you have to buy Camera Control Pro, which is similar to Canon's free supplied Canon EOS Utility. I'm now using the demoversions of Camera Control Pro Action!HD 7.5 and AnimatorHD. Only with AnimatorHD I don't get live view.
Last edited by Creator Productions (July 12, 2012 (01:31am))
Okay, thanks for the info.
Posts [ 341 to 360 of 583 ]
