I created a user, I might edit some stuff at some point if I see the need.
The criteria for creating new pages for particular brickfilmers is a tough call.
I agree, 10,000 subscriptions on YouTube isn't a good criteria. I agree with jampot on that.
Many brickfilmers that deserve to have a page have much less than 10,000 subs.
I think placing 1st, 2nd, or 3rd in an official competition is a good one. What about brickfilms that won one of the LEGO Tongal 'contests'?
The "over 100,000 views on YouTube" is a complicated one. I'll use myself as an example, don't take it to be haughty or anything.
So I made a 25 second LEGO Iron Man 3 trailer (more of a teaser trailer, really, because of the length) and it has gotten about 343,000 views. I released it at the perfect time compared to when the movie came out so it got a ton of views and is one of the top 10 results if you search for "LEGO Iron Man 3 trailer". I would certainly not say it's deserving of it's own page on the wiki but technically it meets one of the needed criteria. Watch it for yourself, there's nothing particularly special or amazing about it; it just got a lot of views because of content.
The film that I'm most proud of so far is definitely Perpetual Twilight (again, I'm using myself as an example so I can have more accurate statistics without having to research other people's content, I don't actually mean my film should get a page). If any of my films were deserving of a page it would be this one. It only has 1,100 views, mostly because it's nothing one would search for. People won't just run across it on YouTube because it's not something people are familiar with. Because of this, it won't meet the 100,000 views criteria. It did win Contrast but that was an unofficial contest so it's irrelevant. So basically, the film that is much better than any of my others and that actually has some slightly newer/different/rarely seen techniques wouldn't have a chance of getting a page.
If that's just my videos, imagine how it could be for many other brickfilmers who have truly amazing films but might not really meet the criteria.
Basically I think the criteria for films is not very accurate, but I also don't have any suggestion for making it better.
That was really long and I don't think I said much worthwhile, sorry.
EDIT: Dang, you guys started a whole new page of discussion while I wrote this.