Re: What was the last movie you watched?

Legocloniac477 wrote:
FlyingMinifig wrote:

(does anyone actually read these....?).

Yes. My friends seem to adore this film, but when I saw it I felt let down. I didn't understand what I didn't like about it, but what you wrote here seems to sum up what I was feeling.

Good to know.  I actually only intended to write one or two paragraphs, but for some reason it ended up being huge.

Anyway:

Inglorious B@$t3rds (2009)

This is the first time I've watched a Tarantino movie.  I wasn't entirely sure what to expect, but I have to say... I liked it.

It wasn't as violent/full of "bad language" as I'd expected, given what I'd heard about Tarantino (though it still was very violent).  I really like how seemingly innocuous scenes could build tension, and still have funny moments.  The opening scene, as well as the scene in the restaurant (between Shosanna and Col. Landa) and the tavern scene are all brilliant.  Most of the actors are great, especially Christoph Waltz as Col. Hans Landa--he really deserved to win an Oscar for that performance (just the way he extinguished his cigarette in the strudel...).  (I also think Landa is now one of my new favourite cinematic villains.)  I also highly impressed by dialogue in the different languages--the accents were realistic (which I suppose is to be expected, given most of the actors are German or French).  In this day and age of bad grammar and accents in foreign languages in Hollywood films it's highly refreshing.  The cinematography was interesting in several places; I really want to try make a 360-degree rotating shot around characters sitting at a table.  The music was great as well, even if it was sometimes anachronistic--it's used to great (and hilarious) effect when Sgt. Stieglitz is introduced, for example.  There are also some random hilarious moments that come out of nowhere

Spoiler (click to read)

such as when the eponymous B@$t3rds pose as Italians in the cinema, speaking in ludicrously bad accents... and Landa suddenly starts speaking to them in fluent Italian...

Still, I feel there were a few issues.  For one, there are several characters who get introduced, but never developed.  Hugo Stieglitz, for instance--

Spoiler (click to read)

He's a renegade soldier who likes killing Nazis, and that's literally all we ever know about him.  We never learn why he'd started killing Gestapo officers, and he then gets killed off in the tavern so we never learn anything more about him, even though it would have been interesting to explore it further.

  Or there's the British guy, Hicox.

Spoiler (click to read)

He gets introduced as the commanding officer for Operation Kino, and then spends all of ten minutes on screen (most of which is spent arguing with a Gestapo officer) before getting killed off.  He could have been cut out of the film and there wouldn't be any major difference.

  I really would have liked to see more of these characters, but they don't really have all that much of an impact.  In addition, I felt that the character of Arno Raine was a bit cheesy and one-dimensional, though still funny in some moments.  The pacing also feels a bit off--I like the non-linear way the story is told and the way two seemingly unrelated stories are brought together, but the way the film switches between these two stories seems a bit clumsy.  The idea of having "chapters" seemed somewhat unnecessary to me since there are only two main plots, but I liked the idea.

Still, I really liked it.  I'd definitely recommend watching it if you're OK with violence, and some offensive language.  And scalpings....

Last edited by Mr Vertigo (July 14, 2014 (12:10pm))

Retribution (3rd place in BRAWL 2015)

&Smeagol      make the most of being surrounded by single, educated women your own age on a regular basis in college
AquaMorph    I dunno women are expensive

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007)

When Cinema Sins released a sin video for this one, I realised that they haven't counted the sins of a Harry Potter movie since Goblet of Fire. I also realised that I haven't watched one since last week. So, I watched it. Also, this is the first Harry Potter movie that I ever remember seeing the trailer for, way back when...(harp plays flashback music)

In all seriousness, I'd go so far as to say that this is my new favourite--even better than Prisoner of Azkaban, by just a bit. Critics have commented on Imelda Staunton's performance, as Dolores Umbridge, as "close to stealing the show". And I say, "certainly". She has that charm that villains have, which makes the viewer absolutely love her, and at the same time despise her. And Helena Bonham Carter was good, too.

Spoiler (click to read)

But, her escape from Azkaban is highly implausible, seeing as she couldn't have survived the blast, but that's just the Cinema Sins talking.

mini/lol

As a whole, while the way the storyline plays out in the end does seem a little like its four predecessors, it is constantly maturing and evolving in a manner that keeps viewers interested. And I'm positive that I'll be watching Year Six next.

But, it is odd how the PG-13 ratings took a break, and let Half-Blood Prince get itself a more dumbed-down-for-younger-audiences PG rating from the MPAA. And then right after that, both parts of Deathly Hallows get a PG-13 rating slapped across their backs. Plus, I didn't catch a single swear in this one. Not even Ron's signature exclamation...oh, come on. You know exactly what I'm talking about. mini/wink

9.8/10

Interesting fact: yesterday was actually the day, five years prior, that Half-Blood Prince was released in cinemas.

Last edited by Mickey (July 15, 2014 (11:15pm))

Have you seen a big-chinned boy?

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

mod edit: merged with "What was the last movie you watched?"
THE LEGO MOVIE

Hi.  Thought I'd post my thoughts & impresion on TLM, since I told people I wouldn't see it.  I will mark the entire article as a spoiler, as it discusses the movie's content throughout.

Spoiler (click to read)

The Lego Movie
Movie Review

I got the first impression that this movie, assuming "Business" as the name of the bad guy, was going to be an anti-business stereotype, something pervasive in cinema today.  After giving it some thought, I concludied that I may be making a rash juedgment, and that I should give the movie a chance.

I want to lead by telling everyone that I was wrong.  Not only that, there was a great message about individuality.  Lord/ President Business was not really a businessman, but an administrator, ruthlessly obsessed with control and conformity (Think Putin/Obama/Morsi).  The micromanagers were his bureaucrats who kept everything and everyone in line.  The Lego Movie, as an archetype, was a clash between libertarian values of being free to pursu eone's own creativity (or in Emmet's case, even a lack of it), and a statist world of rules for their own sake, and a rigid order under which all are subjected to living.  This was icing on the cake; everything else about this movie was excellent.  Boy, am I glad I am wrong and gave this movie a chance.

The humor wasn't childish, something else I expected.  Since the 1990s, animated and family films tried to appeal to adults, so they wouldn't be bored.  During the Golden Age of animation, writers di this by actually writing at an adult level.  These days, they do it by using pop culture references and humor.  Think about how the genie in "Aladdin" does Jack Nickelson impersonations.  And, while there are many pop culture icons who have been rleased in Lego form are represented as Lego characters, the humor doesn't really do this.  When characters from pop culture, like Batman, are used, it's presented a lot smarter than that, and often in a Lego context.

I move on to the live action segment before going chronologically, beause this parallels everything that goes on in Bricksburg and the rest of the Lego multiverse.  The movie would not be nearly the same without it.  Emmet takes on a symbolism that he didn't have before, and also, the story becomes a hero's journey, a topic that came out of decades of research by sci-fi publisher John W. Campbell.

Campbell asserts that heroes of al cultures follow similar journeys.  Essentially, they're all have parallels to the life of Jesus.  For instance, Jesus was asked by his mother to perform his first miracle, and he refused, stating that it's not his time.  Heroes throughout fiction all refuse the call to adventure in the same way: Luke Skywalker said he couldn't join Obi-Wan, Frodo didn't want to set out to destroy the One Ring, etc.  At one point of the hero's journey, the character is cut off from his world completely.  This is called "Belly of the whale".  For Emmet, this moment comes when he falls off his world into the basement floor.  The hero always conquers two worlds, his own and a higher realm.  In Emmet's case, it's both his world and the live action world that is freed from the strict order.

Notice that the boy, who, like the spaceman, is also named Benny, returns Emmet to Bricksburg, the colorful jewel-encrusted tube Benny slides him through is labelled, "Magic Portal".  I don't have to tell you it's a tribute to what's considered the first Lego brickfilm.

I absolutely love the live action part and its symbolism.  It had a touching ending and a great lesson for adults.

The pace is very rapid, right from the beginning.  Within a few seconds, we're in the middle of a conflict between Virtruvius and Lord Business, and the entire plot is set up.  Virtruvius is blinded immediately, we learn Lord Business' ingtents, and about the piece of resistance.  The entire plot is set up within 30 seconds.  Dialogue is kept at a brisk pace, with charcters' lines frequently overlapping each other, but it's not non-stop and the movie has has the comedic timing that is lacking in Disney/Pixar's non-stop dialogue movie,  "A Bug's Life".

Before seing the plot unfold, all I knew about the song, "Everything Is Awesome", was that it was in the movie.  I didnt know why, but I just had the feeling that it was a propaganda song.  I was right!

When Emmet first meets Wyldstyle, I love how her hair moves.  When I animated the character Melissa in my own series, I try to make her hair flow the same way when her head stops moving.  It's good for any Brickfilmer who animates girls with flowing hair to study this moment in the film.

Because of the live action sequence, there is a whole new perspective, as we now know that the events in Bricksburg and the adventures of Emmet and WyldStyle are actually the expression of Benny the child's imagination.  This makes the Lego Movie something worth viewing more than once, as you can see everything from this new perspective the second time.  For instance, it now makes sense that Batman is dating Wyldstyle, something we just accept the first time around because it's funny!

While the Lego world is a commentary on a statist/communist/socialist society, Cloud Cuukoo land, at least without the symbolism of the live action sequence, satirizes an anarchist society.  It's represented by the bricks Benny the human is allowed to use for play.  With his Lego collection there are no rules. 

I feel bad for Unikitty for losing her home. 

NOTICE: This was a draft, and I had some of the info wrong and sketchy notions instead of my full thoughts.  Below is the post I meant to make:

Spoiler (click to read)

This reviews many plot details about The Lego Movie, and so I'm going to mark the entire review as a spoiler.

Firstly, I prejudged the movie based on things TLG released about President Business, the story's antagonist.  I'm mature enough to admit when I was wrong.  I WAS WRONG.  I expected a cliched anti-business message, which has been trending in family movies.  It was just the opposite.  Aside everything else, The Lego movie was an anti-conformist, anti-statist movie.  Lord/President Business wasn't really presented as a businessman although he did run a business, an oil business to boot; he was actually an administrator.  The theme was the triumph of libertarian thought over the tyranny of statism (think Putin/ Obama/ Morsi).  No stereotypes either in the message, or just about anything about the movie, existed.

This was icing on the cake.  In most children's movies from the 90s on, I tend to groan because the "adult" humor has been really lame.  Think about the Genie in "Alladdin", and how he impersonates Jack Nicholson.  Today's movies are loaded with references to things like this that are less timeless and date movies to future audiences.  The Lego Movie makes plenty of pop culture references, but they are actually done "funnily" (funny (adv.)= so as to be funny).  The Lego Movie also pays homage to its own history.  Good Cop/Bad Cop's parents' home is constructed like something out of the 1979 Lego Idea Book, since they are older.  The best use of this is Benny, the Spaceman, an endearing character.  His inability to cope with modern technology is one thing, but the label on him is faded, as most early printed figures tend to be, and his helmet is cracked in the spot where it really had a weakness.  (the earliest space helmets also were nearly impossible to remove.)

Everything was strictly ordered in the universe of the movie.  The builders were "conformists" or popularly called "sheep", unable to look outside their world and see the bigger picture, that their order was being controlled by President Business.  He ran an oil company, but it wasn't about that.  He ran a media outlet too, a construction company, everything!  It was all organized to prevent disruption of the conformist order.  The "Where Are My Pants" segment kept our hero, Emmet, and all the other generic builders, from focusing on President Business' business (like putting deviants to sleep!)  Emmet is the ultimate conformist, going along with anybody, following all the rules, and never having an original thought.

The plot is set up immediately with the "prophecy", the Kragle, and the way to defeat Lord Business.  It was action packed even in the first moments.  But there was still so much to be discovered along the way as the movie unfolded.  Finding out what the Kragle is was a funny revelation.  I like the way Lord Business mispronounces all the artifacts.

Lord Business' instructions are never to be deviated from.  Anything "weird looking" is destroyed.  Anything fishy is to be reported (the U.S. President once had a web site for citizens to report any civilian saying anything "fishy" about national health care.  That was quickly criticized and removed.)  Well, Emmet loses his instructions and soon gets entangled in the world, which is where plot stories tend to begin.  (You don't have to know all of the hero's back story; it all begins when he gets involved in the order.)

We all know the plot, so I'll just go on to my thoughts before I tie in the above to my underlying point later.  Emmet is in the classic "plot" type story (author Orson Scott Card calls the type an "Event" story), where there the world is under a repressive order and the hero changes it (or fails).  Emmet's adventure pretty closely follows th Hero's journey, although not in the traditional order.  his long fall is the Belly of the whale, and his transcendence into a new world is the live action sequence.  He conquers both worlds in the end.

There are may things to watch for throughout.  For instance, watch what happens when Lord Business throws the Band-Aid.  Look at the tube in the live-action sequence.  It is marked "MAGIC PORTAL", an homage to the godfather of all Brickfilms.  There's so much to see.  JohnD Thunder mentioned that he watched the entire movie frame-by-frame.  I'd love to see his Easter Egg report.

The humor isn't dummbed down.  Watching it with my brother, he says, "There is a lot of "Robot Chicken" humor.  I never looked at it that way, but he is right.  I love the Invisible Jet joke.  Notice that when the Batmobile is blown up, then the jet, the music is th exacg same chord both times with the exact same inflection.  The music was awesome, but as expected, since Mark Mothersbaugh, lead singer & Keyboardist from Devo, composed it.

When I heard Everything Is Awesome, I hadn't seen the movie but speculated that it was a propaganda song.  I was right.  Reminds me of the Twilight Episode "It's a Good Life", written by Damon Knight.  The song keeps the Lego masses in line, happy with all being done while their leader is using them to spell their own doom!

The best six seconds in the movie: "All units, attack that spaceship!"  BENNY: "SAPECSHIP!!!!!"

Another joke I like: Emmet sees Virtruvius' home, and he says, "What a weirdly decorated place you have here."  Virtruvius: "Thank you!"  And the way he says it.  I also like "infinityeth floor", sounds like something I'd say in one of my many surreal moments.

Now to the live action sequence.  I absolutely loved it and everything about it!  It took a great movie and turned it into an epic allegory.  Emmet represents the young boy, Finn, and President Business is his father.  It becomes more emotional from that point on as you understand that Finn's internal conflict is seen in the Lego story.  The ending is a very touching moment.  This scene reveals that everything that happens in the movie is really Finn's imagination.  Wild!  It gives the movie a lot of rewatchability.  The next time around, everything from the first 75% of the movie can be seen in a new context.  It's like going back and watching The Sixth Sense again after knowing the surprise.  Especially the things President Business says, like "Everyone keeps messing with my stuff!", his confusion with disorder, etc.  The movie also becomes more touching agt this point, especially the happy ending!  Also, when Emmet first comes into contact with the Piece of Resistance, and there's the surreal imagery with the cat poster and stuff, you hear (and vaguely see) Finn saying, "it's your turn to be the hero."  Lots of subtlety throughout, and just about every word advances the plot AND symbolism.  It's like Samurai Jack, except it's the sparsity of the dialogue in that series that makes it have such impact.  As such, the writers of Samurai Jack arfe careful to make every word count, further enhancing its dramatic value.  The Lego movie does that while maintaining very thick dialogue.  Sometimes the banter is non-stop, even characters' lines overlapping each other (see Emmet as a table in the Old West)  The fast pace is blended perfectly with comedic timing.  The movie "A Bugs Life" tried the non-stop pace but it fails because it lacked comedic timing.

Where President Business' order is a spoof of statism, Cloud Cuukoo Palace is an observation of anarchy.  Very funny as well.  "and No negativity of any kind."  WyldStyle: "You said no, like, a thousand times."  Everyone loves Abe Lincoln and his chair.  When the live action segment is introduced it symbolism turns from an anarchy into Finn's imagination.  The bricks that make up Cloud Cuukooland are his to use, and so he can do whatever he wants with those.  In the live action sequence, the father says, "You have your own bricks", and you see them in a box with CLOUD printed on it.  Look for that!  His collection also has an unusually high proportion of colors mainly seen in Friends sets, so it makes me wonder.

There was almost nothing to be critical about.  Something I thought in a foolish assumption I wouldn't enjoy is now one of my all-time favorite movies, and that of my children, and wife, and brother, and millions of others.  The message of individuality, questioning authority for authority's sake, and an allegory of libertarinism vs socialism was only one of many positive aspects of this film.  Everything else was top notch and of highest production values.  On an 11 point scale of 0 to 10, I give it a 10, along with "2001: A Space Odyssey", "The Prince Of Egypt", and "Strange Brew" (you read right: "Strange Brew").  And not just because I'm a Lego fan.  I'm not big on CGI movies, but it doesn't even feel like it is.  Most of the time, you feel like you're watching 10 billion Lego bricks.  It belongs in the libraries of any fan of animation.

Last edited by HoldingOurOwn (July 19, 2014 (10:06am))

https://vimeo.com/channels/holdingourown      http://holding-our-own.tumblr.com

"None practice tolerance less frequently than those who most loudly preach it."

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

I'm glad you decided to watch it.

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

Speaking of which, Mickey...

All 8 Harry Potter films
With some friends. We just finished it about an hour and a half ago (now being 16:10) having started at about 13:20 yesterday. We took a six hour break between 5 and 6 to have a nap.

Like I've said before, behind BIONICLE, Harry Potter has been one of the biggest creative influences on me, and was a huge part of my childhood. It fed my love of mythology and eventually drove me to try my hand at writing a book. Lo and behold, I managed to write my own modern fantasy novel in five months, which I would consider my greatest achievement of last year.

I don't know how to summarise why I love Harry Potter so much, but both the books and films have such great emotional resonance with me that I can't help but go back to them. Frequently. I went on the studio tour a few months ago (and plan to go again), have got almost 100% on the chapters on Pottermore...I really love this franchise.

Now I just have to survive the next two years, waiting for Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them.

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/ZoefDeHaas/stuff/sig1.png
"Nothing goes down 'less I'm involved. No nuggets. No onion rings. No nothin'. A cheeseburger gets sold in the park, I want in! You got fat while we starved on the streets...now it's my turn!" -Harley Morenstein

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

I'm glad you enjoyed it, HOO.

Spoiler (click to read)

But, it's been revealed that the kid's name is Finn. The spaceman is named Benny. This link to IMDB proves this fact.

Last edited by Mickey (July 16, 2014 (12:02pm))

Have you seen a big-chinned boy?

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

Mickey, and to all the BIM gang, I am wrong again!  I got a character's name wrong (In Mickey's spoiler) and Mickey is right.  My original post was actually my draft, written right after watching the movie, and I misheard the name!  I corrected this in my proof, after the 2nd viewing & realizing I had misheard the name the 1st time, but accidentally posted my draft instead, which had mistakes & included some incomplete ideas.

I realized the wrong character name immediately after posting, but had to go to work and leave it uncorrected until my shift ended a half hour ago.

I located my final review of the movie and am posting it in my above post, as a second spoiler, if anyone cares to read.  I'd love to read the opinions of others who didn't see it until it came out on DVD, or saw it in the movies but never chimed in.

https://vimeo.com/channels/holdingourown      http://holding-our-own.tumblr.com

"None practice tolerance less frequently than those who most loudly preach it."

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

That's OK, HOO. Everyone makes mistakes. mini/wink A few years back, I posted a review here of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. I wrote how I thought Tilda Swinton did a great job playing an elderly Daisy. That was until I realised that it was just Cate Blanchett, doused in makeup and fake wrinkles, to make her look old. mini/lol

Cars (2006)

I watched this film when it was first released, when me and my brother (who is now twelve) was four, and my youngest brother (who is turning nine next month) wasn't even a year old yet. I remember being relatively new to Pixar...maybe that was why I watched Toy Story 2 before watching its predecessor. And maybe that's why I like it better than the first one!

Cars was, at one time, my favourite Pixar movie, as well as my favourite movie. But, then again, that was before Up and The LEGO Movie. I understand that a lot of people acknowledge this movie as "the turning point, in which Pixar went dreadfully wrong". But, they might just be mistaking this one for the sequel.

Just over eight years later, Cars is still a remarkable entry into Pixar's legacy. Its plot hits many--if not, all--of the right notes in just how to create a touching story. The James Taylor song is absolutely wonderful, accompanying a beautiful part in the movie; it's just too bad that my DVD got scratchy during the middle of the scene, ruining the moment. It has its great parts for kids, and its great parts for adults too. Its humor and storyline make it more distinctive and more mature for a Pixar animation. I found myself laughing at things that I don't think I've ever laughed at before, and found myself sitting quietly on the sofa at moments I've laughed at in the past. Randy Newman's score helps the film out quite a lot, with some of country music's most popular icons there to back him up, if he ever needs help. Lasseter's direction feels different, as if the Coen brothers took on a Pixar film. But, difference isn't always a bad thing, and he leads a great film, with some co-direction by Joe Ranft.

Cars was also one of the last films for a few acting veterans, namely George Carlin and Paul Newman. They do great jobs, and can even be a little funny, at times.

To sum up, Cars is an underrated Pixar treasure, with funny lines of dialogue for kids and a deep, powerful message for adults. It might not be considered a masterpiece, but it certainly has its moments of glory.

9.8/10

Million Dollar Arm (2014)

This is an enjoyable one. It has an uplifting story and some hilarious moments. It just worries me a little bit that Disney is sneaking sexual references into a PG-rated movie of theirs. Also, when I realised that Amit was shooting film on his camera during almost every scene with him in it, and that most of the archived video used during the end credits was probably his, I thought that he could easily compile all of his recorded film into a documentary and fill up the same 124-minute-long running time that this film has. mini/lol I know I would watch that!

9.5/10

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009)

Having turned five years old this week, Year Six is tricky. It has a promising start, and I find it interesting that He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named has the capability to cross over into the Muggle world. But, it has a constantly dark feel (not that the story is dark--it is--but I'm mainly talking about how it's sometimes too dark to even see what's happening on the screen) and unnecessary scenes that are just there for the sake of prolonging its two-and-a-half-hour-long running time.

Spoiler (click to read)

I'm, of course, talking about the death of Hagrid's giant spider, Harry and Ginny's scenes of kissing/embracing, and the confusing love triangle that Ron is trapped in. And why set up that scene in the Underground diner if you'll never return to it? Also, I find it silly that Dumbledore and Harry travel to the outside of the island cave, instead of simply transporting themselves inside to begin with.

But, I won't lie. The ending is absolutely moving. It has an underlying message, telling viewers not to judge a book by its cover, because that's what Harry did, and that's why he is stuck in a state of hatred and anger. I think we can all learn from that. mini/wink

All in all, this one can get a little boring at times. But, I certainly wasn't disappointed with it. Is it a bad movie? No. Could it do better? Yes, indeed! But, all film franchises have that one film that doesn't quite live up to the likenesses of its predecessors/sequels. And it won't stop me from watching the two-part finale, that is Year Seven.

8/10

Last edited by Mickey (July 18, 2014 (10:23am))

Have you seen a big-chinned boy?

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014)

One of the best films I have seen in a while, the humour is great, I love the simplicity of the cinematography and the casting is perfect.

I really enjoyed this film and I hope more films like this will be produced.

9.5/10


Rain Man (1988)

This was a really inspirational film, the acting and the story was superb and the cinematography (conveying the insanity and troubles of the main characters) was amazing.

I would highly recommend this film therefore:

10/10

- Available to compose for any upcoming projects -

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

MegaGIll, Rain Man is an excellent 80s movie, and it really depicts the challenges of having people with Autism as part of your life.  Dustin Hoffman is one of my favorite actors, and although the movie doesn't present a realistic picture of what autism is (but it's from another era), and the real story was how the man who cares for his brother learns to be a less selfish person.

"DEFINITELY SHORTS ON THE HIGHWAY!"

https://vimeo.com/channels/holdingourown      http://holding-our-own.tumblr.com

"None practice tolerance less frequently than those who most loudly preach it."

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
...of the rise of the dawn of the reboot of the sequel of the prequel of the...
Jokes aside, this was a great film.  Definitely had that 'Avatar'/'Pocahontas' feel, which is no bad thing if done right, which it was.
The visual effects were easily some of the best I've seen in recent cinema (hats of to WETA digital), the apes were so life-like and genuinely looked like they were real throughout a lot of the film.
I guess my only real criticism of the film was some of the sign language "dialogue" between the apes; it just felt a bit unnatural in places.

Great film overall, though.  Easily one of my favourites of 2014
8/10

http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2889/8957456571_f23867aeec_o.jpg
PITCH Part 1 Out Now!
Part 2 Coming Soon

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

IIRC, there was sign language & French communication in the original novel of Planet of the Apes.  But I'm surprised at the Avatar comparison, because I heard that there was very dynamic characterization and relationships between characters.

https://vimeo.com/channels/holdingourown      http://holding-our-own.tumblr.com

"None practice tolerance less frequently than those who most loudly preach it."

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

HoldingOurOwn wrote:

IIRC, there was sign language & French communication in the original novel of Planet of the Apes.  But I'm surprised at the Avatar comparison, because I heard that there was very dynamic characterization and relationships between characters.

The Avatar comparison is because of the general storyline which is very similar - that being said, Dances with Wolves was first

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

HoldingOurOwn wrote:

IIRC, there was sign language & French communication in the original novel of Planet of the Apes.  But I'm surprised at the Avatar comparison, because I heard that there was very dynamic characterization and relationships between characters.

As Lucas said, the Avatar comparison was more to do with some of the themes contained within the film; (gonna mark them as spoilers just in case)

Spoiler (click to read)

Acceptance of outsiders, Group of human-like creatures afraid of humans and their weapons, One character trying to convince the human-like creatures to get along with the humans etc.

Also as far as the sign language criticism, I meant that what they were saying was a little unnatural, not the signing itself.

Lucas wrote:

The Avatar comparison is because of the general storyline which is very similar - that being said, Dances with Wolves was first

Good point, I should have included 'Dances with Wolves' in that comparison.

Last edited by Saminatorger (July 21, 2014 (03:11pm))

http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2889/8957456571_f23867aeec_o.jpg
PITCH Part 1 Out Now!
Part 2 Coming Soon

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

I'm avoiding the reboots of Planet of the Apes like the plague. The fun of the original is that the titular apes have devolved from humanity - an idea which I love considering how we're showing signs of regression, what with countries becoming all xenophobic in the wake of an economic crisis (because we never learn). Making it so the apes are a result of genetic tampering, and thus the only people to blame for this mess are those pesky scientists whilst everyone else is totally guilt-free just ruins it for me.

Plus, I think apocalypse narratives always work best backwards. We start with the result and backpedal. Right, Big Brother controls Oceania, and possibly Eurasia/Eastasia - if they even exist. Now how did we get here?

YouTube
Max, She/They

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

I like the backwards approach, too.  Makes it a mystery that needs to be solved, and clues are discovered along the way.

https://vimeo.com/channels/holdingourown      http://holding-our-own.tumblr.com

"None practice tolerance less frequently than those who most loudly preach it."

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

Just watched Jodorowsky's Dune, a documentory about Jodorowsky's unfinished Dune film, and I really enjoyed it, it was a look into a truly bizarre and fascinating project that is like nothing I have ever seen.

If you want to see it, which you should (here is a trailer) it would probibly help to see El Topo or Holy Mountain, Jodorowsky is like a more surreal David Lynch.

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

There's a guy who's more surreal than David Lynch?

*runs to buy entire filmography*

YouTube
Max, She/They

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

Ride Along

Now this was a fun film. The story was ridiculous, but I liked it; very bizarre humour. The act was average, I recognised a couple of faces but many of the actors I did not distinguish.

The effects and cinematography were quite good and I also enjoyed

Spoiler (click to read)

The massive chase at the beginning and end(highlight to read)

7/10


The Matrix

Not much to say but this was an excellent movie.

"Nuff said"

9.5/10

- Available to compose for any upcoming projects -

Re: What was the last movie you watched?

Max Butcher wrote:

There's a guy who's more surreal than David Lynch?

*runs to buy entire filmography*

  A freind who watched it with me ask me if I liked Holy Mountain, I just looked.at her and said, "I don't know how I feel about it but I would watch it again"