Galactic Films wrote:Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith
So weird, I literally watched the last 23 minutes of that a little while ago with my younger brother.
Batman '89
Earlier today, I thought about how good TDKR was (even though TDK is the best out of Nolan's set). Since I had already seen those, as well as Batman '66, I wanted to dive into "the middles". The "middles" is my nickname for the four Batman movies that came between '66 and Nolan. So, I bought a copy of this film (on a VHS tape) and enjoyed "Joker '89".
But seriously, that Nicholson stole the show. Nicholson's Joker is remarkable, magnificent, lovely, brilliant, and excellent. Oh, and Keaton is good too.
I was on a fence about one particular scene where
Spoiler (click to read)
Napier is revealed to have shot Bruce's parents, instead of Joe Chill, their original murderer in the comic books. In fact, when Napier stepped into the light, I was convinced it was Chill, up until the moment when he said his line, which instantly led me to understand that it was indeed Jack Napier, and not Joe Chill.
I kind of liked that idea, but I felt that it ruined the original spirit of the comics, and probably upset a lot of fans when the film came to cinemas.
Also, despite what critics said about
Spoiler (click to read)
Prince's original songs being used in the film, I actually kinda liked them. They were able to maintain the 1980s atmosphere, and kept the appearance of this film from looking too "film noir".
Burton's vision of Gotham is darkly beautiful and beautifully dark. I'm blown away by all the little details that were added to the sets. Elfman's score is marvelous, and compliments the film well (even though I've heard it all before, on the LEGO DC Comics videogame).
It might be true that '89 is a little slower-paced and darker than '66, and even Nolan's set. But, holy Clooney, Batman! There's no Bat like Bat '89!
9.3/10
Last edited by Mickey (February 23, 2014 (11:24am))
Have you seen a big-chinned boy?