This is getting monotonous, anyhow:
- There was a severe lack of creative direction/plot in the film. It was incredibly predictable.
- There was a general absence of the wit, depth and excitement that went hand-in-hand with the previous films.
- The whole film was smothered with stupid and severely overused CGI.
- There was pitifully little character development, especially between Indy and his newfound, annoying son.
- Some characters were completely out-of-sync with their previous selves, see no longer feisty Marion.
- Incredible amount of stupidity, see surviving nuclear detonation in a fridge.
- No or meagre attention to detail.
- Questionable ending, whether it was intended or not.

Same here. As much as I disliked Indy 4, there were some parts in there that were enjoyable.

What if someone said this about Wookiees? I don't own an Ewok toy and I don't know anybody who ever did. I don't think I've ever seen one for sale, except for the lego ones (duh.) but oh my god do you really have to go on saying sexist things like all girls don't care about films unless cute things are there. Really. Don't do that. Like I don't know if all the time I've been spending on tumblr has caused me to interpret things for the worst, but just stop inflicting gender roles. This goes for you too George, and all your film director friends.

To avoid things getting nasty I'll move on. OF COURSE it's about making money!! Almost any time a sequel to something is made, it's about getting money!! But the question is, why would Wookiees not get Lucas anymore money than Ewoks? Objectively they have equal appeal as cuddle objects. So I don't see why you are so paranoid about me *gasp* liking the Ewoks! Were they not "manly" enough for everyone's beloved trilogy? If that's why you don't like them, and you don't like Jar Jar because he wasn't serious enough for the film, grow up.  There is a lot wrong with Star Wars but I don't think those two things are part of the problem.

I've said enough for now, sorry if I came across as mean, I'm just half asleep right now. Boy, am I gonna regret posting this tomorrow. Also I gotta see this worlds strongest fridge thing.

Unless there's supposed to be a sequel, like with The Lord of the Rings. But, with something like this, then yeah, it's ridiculous.

If the book publishers hadn't told Mr Tolkien to split it into three volumes and LoTR was published as one book anyways someone would still probably split it into threes when it came time to make the movie because it is a much bigger deal that way. (Or maybe not!! I mean they condensed six or seven volumes of Scott Pilgrim into a single movie... I guess it would depend on how big of a success the book of LotR would have been I it was published in its intended form.)