Bricks in Motion
We are a friendly filmmaking community devoted to the art of stop-motion animation using LEGO® and similar construction toys. Here, you can share your work, join our community of other brickfilmers, and participate in periodic animation contests!
A place to discuss, share, and create stop motion films.
Ad
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Could someone PLEASE make me a logo?
I've tried that in GIMP,but i failed.
I made this in GIMP easily:
Here you go.
I help you way too often
-LASF
Cool LASF! 
Im gonna make an animated logo (have the idea what its gonna do... just need to think how im gonna make my logo look..) when i get a new laptop, instead of my mac 
-FBS
cooldynamyteproductions wrote:Could someone PLEASE make me a logo?
I've tried that in GIMP,but i failed.I made this in GIMP easily:
Here you go.
I help you way too often
-LASF
Not exactly what i wanted,but,thanks,man!!!
EDIT:watch my new intro here.
Last edited by Troodon (September 10, 2011 (11:50am))
I made this in GIMP easily:
[insert massive image here]
Here you go.
I help you way too often
-LASF
Awesome! You typed some words in an obnoxious font!
This thread just broke my graphic designer heart again. The pain. Oh, the pain.
It hurts me that people think these are logos.
Awesome! You typed some words in an obnoxious font!
Wow, dude. 
Chill out.
-LASF
Last edited by LASF (September 11, 2011 (08:02am))
I don't know, it doesn't look like much of a logo to me. Yes, the font is pretty flamey but a logo usually has some sort of symbol on it. Also, perhaps make it smaller and more compact. BTW, Sean usually knows what he's doing.
So what classifies a logo? Is this at all anything even like a logo?
Sorry about the small pic. I can't find the bigger one.
Or my sig?
By the way, how do you make small/big text?
Last edited by Mighty Wanderer (September 11, 2011 (08:24am))
Okay, I have said this many times before, but this drives me crazy when I see it. This is a definition of the term logo. A Logo should be a graphic that catches attention, it is not a picture of a minifigure with your name next to it. There are billions of combinations for minifigures out there. I would give a number, but it just gets bigger every time Lego cranks out another set. People are not going to associate a specific minifigure with you. If you want a logo people will recognize, be creative. And take this as an example. Look at the BricksinMotion.com logo. If I were to take it and desaturate it, then shrink it down 75%, would you recognize it? Now take your logo. If it is a minifigure that you find recognizable due to the green shirt, desaturation will remove that factor. Or is it the new curved-brim hat that makes it so recognizable? Shrink it down and it's now just any ordinary minifigure. Take a look at the IBM logo. True, it is text, but the font is designed to make it unique. Please, before you just post a picture of a minifigure and slap "legoman98forever" on it, take time to come up with a creative and clever logo. And don't feel down if this is your first shot at a logo, Lego went through several changes before it's current one.
Sean wrote:This thread just broke my graphic designer heart again. The pain. Oh, the pain.
Sean wrote:It hurts me that people think these are logos.
Sean wrote:Awesome! You typed some words in an obnoxious font!
Wow, dude.
-LASF
Sean's right. These aren't logos. Logos have to have some sort of artistic style or talent involved. Not something downloaded from dafont.com or the like.
This is my logo.
It hurts me that people think these are logos.
To be fair, your logo isn't exactly the pinnacle of originality either...
Sean wrote:It hurts me that people think these are logos.
To be fair, your logo isn't exactly the pinnacle of originality either...
The point I'm making isn't about originality - simplicity often works best. It's about designing an identity rather than throwing down some clipart/photo and some badly formatted/styled text.
Brickyman wrote:Sean wrote:It hurts me that people think these are logos.
To be fair, your logo isn't exactly the pinnacle of originality either...
The point I'm making isn't about originality - simplicity often works best. It's about designing an identity rather than throwing down some clipart/photo and some badly formatted/styled text.
I'm soon getting Photoshop. I'm not too experienced with GIMP.
-LASF
Throwing money at things doesn't make up for a lack of basic skills. Read a book on it, find some tutorials, watch a professional at work... and, of course, practice.
^ This. Draw logo concepts on paper before trying to jump in to doing it directly in the software, no matter how expensive or fancy the software.
LASF wrote:cooldynamyteproductions wrote:Could someone PLEASE make me a logo?
I've tried that in GIMP,but i failed.I made this in GIMP easily:
Here you go.
I help you way too often
-LASF
Not exactly what i wanted,but,thanks,man!!!
EDIT:watch my new intro here.
Meh. dude all that was, was text with sound, it isn't really an intro
This thread just broke my graphic designer heart again. The pain. Oh, the pain.
I know exactly what you mean. 
But i mean I guess every one can't be good at graphic designing.
Last edited by Penguinking (September 13, 2011 (12:04am))
^ This. Draw logo concepts on paper before trying to jump in to doing it directly in the software, no matter how expensive or fancy the software.
Developing design ideas is exactly what I do at school in Art Design. If you don't do any developing then you simply fail the assessment. 
Last edited by Penguinking (September 13, 2011 (12:01am))
Posts [ 421 to 440 of 793 ]
