Bricks in Motion
We are a friendly filmmaking community devoted to the art of stop-motion animation using LEGO® and similar construction toys. Here, you can share your work, join our community of other brickfilmers, and participate in periodic animation contests!
A place to discuss, share, and create stop motion films.
Ad
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Forums - Bricks in Motion » General Film Discussion » The Super Official BiM Upcoming Movie Updates and Discussion Thread
The next Batman film will have no Riddler, but an odd name that I'm not too keen on.
I'm sure he wants to capitalize on the success of the last movie. He's trying to bring in the people who wouldn't normally go see a Batman movie, but watched The Dark Knight.
It's probably the title that they wanted to use because it fits their story.
Well, that too, I guess. 
Sticking an extra word at the end of the last movies title? 
But I'm glad Nolan flat out rejected 3D - something EVERY director should do....
Sorry if somebody already had posted this but;
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/ … evil-34154
New Winnie The Pooh trailer!
Sad thing is, this and Harry Potter 7 Part 2 come out on the same day, and HP is probably going to dominate at the box office. :\
I am making it my priority to see Winnie the Pooh.
Needless to say, this is not making me any more excited about the film. Only when the reviews start mentioning a surprise plot twist involving Mater's death will my interest be peaked.
Lord, will I watch that movie! But Pixar makes sequels for all the wrong movies.The Incredibles 2 and Finding Nemo 2 would have been great. 
Incredibles 2, yes. Finding Nemo 2, no. That said, none of their films really need sequels. No film really does.
Though I do love Toy Story 3.
Not a movie but... CALIFORNICATION season 4 is coming! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=md3qEc9dSBI 
That said, none of their films really need sequels. No film really does.
Need would be the wrong word to use.
That said, none of their films really need sequels. No film really does.
Star Wars, Back to the Future, Lord of the Rings, Three Colors Trilogy, didn't need sequels?
I will argue that Back to the Future didn't need a sequel. I've never heard of the Thee Colors Trilogy, but the other two are really more parts of a longer story.
I will argue that Back to the Future didn't need a sequel. I've never heard of the Thee Colors Trilogy, but the other two are really more parts of a longer story.
Yes, that's my point. They needed sequels.
"Parts" and "sequels" are not the same in my eyes.
But really this whole talk of "needing" sequels is silly. Perhaps it's an argument of semantics, but movies don't really fulfill needs, as such. I'm curious why you made your original statement, Littlebrick. You seem to imply that a sequel is inherently less worthy than an original movie. Why?
Some movie poster news...
Pirates 4
Cowboys & Aliens
Some Green Lantern footage:
http://www.superherohype.com/news/artic … rn-footage
Good stuff.
Posts [ 921 to 940 of 1,406 ]
