Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

Hazzat wrote:

Brickfilms.com died in 2008.

He doesn't know who you are because you're new. Would you like to introduce yourself?

Well... why not? I'm seaforce110, as I said I bought a 9k so I can make better quality brickfilms I already made a few but those are really newbie, I'm actually dutch but I can speak a bit English only my English pronunciation is 'not good enough yet to record' that's why I ask my brother to say it (with much trouble) I like brickfilms.com much more than this site but now every1 moved 2 here ,so that's why I also moved to this site.

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

When I film at 800x600 my imagequality sucks. If I film at 1600x1200, every frame is 1,3 MB mini/eek
I mean, how do you take pictures with such a great quality? Is my pc too slow?

http://imgur.com/qO642.png

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

What's the problem with 1.3 mb? You would need to take 769.2307692307692 frames to get 1GB of HD space used up. That would be 51.28205128205128 seconds of animation. So about 4GB of space for 2 minutes. So it is quite big. To you use SMP? If so I would use something else.

welp
Formerly LegoDudez

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

No, I use Monkeyjam, VirtualDub and WMM. I know, it´s fail >.<

I don´t get awesome frames like ...like PawelKaminski or ...I hope you know what I mean.
They are much more "clean" than my frames

http://imgur.com/qO642.png

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

AncientEngine wrote:

When I film at 800x600 my imagequality sucks. If I film at 1600x1200, every frame is 1,3 MB mini/eek
I mean, how do you take pictures with such a great quality? Is my pc too slow?

I shoot at the same resolution, but I have Tiff files and they're 5 mb each.
Your turn mini/smile

''You don't have to tell him how great is coffee is man!''

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

The complete 2 seconds are 159 MB mini/smile

http://imgur.com/qO642.png

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

remember that Truth Episode one is like 7 minutes long mini/smile

''You don't have to tell him how great is coffee is man!''

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

Ok, you win mini/lol

Last edited by AncientEngine (March 21, 2010 (05:57am))

http://imgur.com/qO642.png

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

Maybe you don't have enough HD (hard drive) space.
How many GB your HD is?

YouTube | Vimeo

SLEEP IS AN IRRESISTIBLE FORCE - BrickLord

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

AncientEngine wrote:

If I film at 1600x1200, every frame is 1,3 MB mini/eek

I capture using HeliumFrog.  It lets you select various image types and qualities.  I capture 1600x1200 images as JPGs at 95% quality, which comes out to about 500 KB per image, which isn't too bad.  Some people say "stay away from JPG", but at 95% quality, I dare say I've never been able to see any artifacts or had any trouble.  And even if i could detect a little, when the images are flying by at 15 FPS, a tiny bit of graininess will not be noticable above the noise you typically get even with HD video cameras.

I then use MonkeyJam to connect the images together at whatever FPS I like, holding some frames more than others if I need to slow something down, and cutting out frames if I need to speed something up.  (MonkeyJam is great for that, also for linking it to a WAV file.)  Then I export HUGE uncompressed 1600x1200 AVIs from MonkeyJam.  Then I use VirtualDub to crop and resize the UnC AVI to whatever size and resolution I want, and then export UnCompressed AVI from Vdub.  Then I use MPEGStreamclip to convert these UnC AVIs to 95% quality Apple Motion JPG compressed AVIs.  These are about 10% the size of the UnC AVIs.  The nice thing about motion JPGs, besides the much smaller size) is that they are still quick to edit in a video editor (just like UnC AVIs are).  My last step is I go back and delete all those huge intermediary UnC AVIs. 

Using HeliumFrog turned me on the to power and simplicity of Motion JPG AVIs.  It automatically captures MotionJPG AVIs as you capture your images while filming.  I don't use those AVIs for anything, so I set them to very low quality, 25%, but that's still sufficient from meaningful onionskinning.

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

I seem to be having some old problems again. I set the gain as low as it can go and the exposure as high as it'll go, and it gives me a much clearer image. But the problem is, when I do that I get some sort of video feed problem or something. Things lag in the video prievew, and the lighting will occasionaly adjust itself, even though everything is on manual. This only happens when I put the gain and exposure settings on that way. Anyone know what's wrong?

I've decided that I'm going to become immune to several select, non-lethal poisons, then put them in my snacks to discourage sneaky snack snatchers. -Littlebrick

deviantART | YouTube

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

I don't know why it does that, but I do know a solution. Set it back to the default settings, and just keep the exposure/grain how it is. It shouldn't affect the quality, as your lighting is the main thing that makes your quality better. I don't put them to the extremes, because exposure and gain are some pretty large settings that can affect your flicker and other settings in huge ways.

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/BGanimations/Signatures/final_400x100.png

Re: QuickCam Pro 9000 Discussion, Tips and Issues

I just put RightLight™ on, let it do the settings, un-check RightLight™ with the auto button then leave them as I animate.

welp
Formerly LegoDudez