I dunno', Squid, I think the composition's quite interesting (except for the bit of tree hanging in the top right of the frame). A lot of films with odd or at first seemingly compositional poor shots can make for interesting viewing. The only specific example I can think right now of is the handheld nature of the flying shots in the TV series Firefly. During a sequence in an episode where they're flying through the mountains on some icy planet, you can barely see the ship itself. It goes against every rule of cinematography and yet it's the best flying sequence in the series.
EDIT: There's this Mexican film called Y Tu Mama Tambien (which I hated) that messed with perspective to create this weird effect, like the foreground and background were completely separate scenes. It's only done in two or three shots and it's really unconventional, but it looks great.
Wow, I got off-topic. Basically, the only rule you should worry about not-breaking is the rule of thirds. Everything else is liminal, and knowing what your films have been like in the past Squid I think experimental composition would work really well.
"Nothing goes down 'less I'm involved. No nuggets. No onion rings. No nothin'. A cheeseburger gets sold in the park, I want in! You got fat while we starved on the streets...now it's my turn!" -Harley Morenstein
