Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

he's a grown man dude, he has a lot of work and has kids (twins) and all. and I think he likes to spend as much time on this site as he can.

he should get an exception, it's Si man.

https://i.imgur.com/C9qJKA8.jpg
youtube]                   Twitter]

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

Seriously, no. There's no reason why he should have an exception; it would take unnecessary work at a time when we're trying to build a website.

And I hate to bring this up, but I don't think Si is exactly infallible when it comes to making intelligent posts either.

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

1) I would not ask for special treatment
2) I think the limit at 20 seconds would be sufficient for everyone and would need very little altering in the settings of this site
3) You aren't infallible either NightOwl, if you hated to bring it up then why say it ?

You might not like or agree with some of my posts, but that doesn't make them spam, that is just a difference of opinion.

Spam is the sort of inane drivel you get on YT where people say 'Yeah First comment' - That is spam, non constructive nonsense.

Also if you search this forum, you will find several other previous posted threads on this subject. The time limit is not a popular feature at all, it's not just me there are lots of others as well who feel the same.

I appreciate that it is required and fully support having one, just lower the limit from 1 minute please.

Last edited by Si665 (April 23, 2009 (03:11am))

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

I'd lower it to 45 seconds if I could because that should be enough to prevent problems with the database flooding, but it's hardcoded into the system so it might be a while before I can fix it - I spent quite a bit of time looking for the right variable and couldn't find the origin point for it in the code.

http://i.imgur.com/wcmcdmf.png

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

Thanks, that sounds like a reasonable compromise.

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

Indeed, that does it.  I was looking at that code earlier and figured there was probably somewhere in another file where the g_post_flood variable is actually initially set, but this should suffice.  The limit is 45 seconds now.

http://i.imgur.com/wcmcdmf.png

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

Oh, why didn't I think of checking there.  Fixed.

http://i.imgur.com/wcmcdmf.png

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

Hmm, 45 seconds? Sounds good to me...




-LBJ

AHH THE JET SET '60'S, THANKS NANCY!
Youtube | JM-Music | Facebook
"But 3D is cool as nipples, man. " - Jimmybob

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

Yeah, according to punBB documentation it's not recommended to lower the flood limit under 45 seconds, but hopefully that will be a substantial enough decrease for users.  Once the film directory opens, users will be making a lot more database calls than we are right now so we'd like to avoid making the server work any more than it needs to.

http://i.imgur.com/wcmcdmf.png

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

OK, taht works fine with me.

meme
http://i.imgur.com/gMfjgiC.jpg

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

If you can't wait to say something and all you want to say is "Cool" to boost your post count then don't post at all

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

Cool mini/tongue

meme
http://i.imgur.com/gMfjgiC.jpg

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

Just like you ^

Re: 60 seconds between posts nonsense again!

That was a joek, shesh.

meme
http://i.imgur.com/gMfjgiC.jpg