Re: Brickfilm Wiki
When you're commenting on your own piece of work, it's difficult not to become personal or include your thoughts and feelings - especially if it is a particularly good film deserving to be in the Wiki in the first place. Besides, what constitutes a 'classic' or 'good' film? It would no doubt be best to start with those that have won awards, for example - as you say - Robota, and perhaps some brickfilms that have been recognised with an annual Bricks In Motion Award, then continue on from there.
I agree with the last part of your comment, I was thinking of that too (about the prizes). I agree it's hard to define a classic, but I meant films that were praised by everybody: The Magic Portal is known as the first brickfilm (although there were others that came first), Robota won many awards, and The Citizen of the Year had, for a while, a festivity dedicated to it by the community (septemberfest, for those who don't know), and the three are often regarded as "best brickfilms of all time".
About the first part, of course nobody should be allowed to write "This is the best brickfilm ever made and it was me who thought of that", but if there's a shot that used some kind of special effects or interesting technique of animation, obviously a creators know much better than a fan how that was done. That's what I'm talking about.
I think it's not difficult at all to be objective: a film page includes the story, something about the production, awards (if it won any) and could include some reviews (and certainly the director isn't the one who wrote them), I don't see in what section one could write his thoughts and feelings. It's not commenting a film, it's saying what's it about and how was it done.
Trailer of my upcoming live action movie
It was a Brickfilms.com member called "Selavast." The 3-hour brickfilm was too large to put on the Internet, so he gave some people DVDs with the film on it. Other than that information, I can't find anything else regarding Selavast or his brickfilm.
