Topic: Is 2D Animation Dead?

Michael Eisner declared traditional 2D animation dead in the early 2000s when Walt Disney Feature animation was floundering. He even went as far as to fire almost 1300 animators in WDFA, even almost all of the overseas animation departments (this event is covered in the film Dream on Silly Dreamer). After the box office failure of Dreamworks's Sinbad, Jeffrey Katzenberg later proclaimed that 'traditional animation was dead.' Even according to Box Office Mojo the top grossing animated feature of all time is Shrek 2, a computer animated feature. The Lion King comes in at #4, and is the only 2D animated feature in the top ten. The next 2D animated film to rake in the dough is Aladdin at #16, The Simpsons Movie at #26, then Beauty and the Beast at #30, followed by Tarzan at #31. Sadly, the rest of the 2D films are spread out, while the bulk are toward the bottom of the list.

So, we have box office numbers, two animation head honchos making bold declarations; not to mention numerous online discussions along with editorials all over the internet.

But is 2D animation really dead? Is it doomed to meager arthouse projects? Small film festival circuits?
There are those who argue that it's alive and well. There's even some rebel resistance online.
Hayao Miyazaki of Studio Ghibli fame had this to say..."If [hand-drawn animation] is a dying craft, we can't do anything about it. Civilization moves on. Where are all the fresco painters now? Where are the landscape artists? What are they doing now? The world is changing. I have been very fortunate to be able to do the same job for 40 years. That's rare in any era." The ironic thing about Miyazaki's statement is that his films have profited fairly well in Japan & worldwide; all of which are traditional 2D animated films. Even Ponyo had watercolor backgrounds and hand painted animation cels (which haven't been used by Disney since The Little Mermaid). But sadly the numbers don't lie. The humble profits of Spirited Away just barely comes close to the profits of the first Shrek film.

So I submit to you oh keepers of the animation flame here on the forums.
Is 2D animation really dead?

Discuss!

"Tell stories that matter to you, not stories that'll sell." - Stephen Tobolowsky

YouTube/Twitter/SG

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

Eh, are we talking about 2D animation in general or traditional animation?

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

Squash wrote:

Eh, are we talking about 2D animation in general or traditional animation?

Both are fair game in this discussion. 2D on a computer, traditional cel animation...pick away if you wish.

Forgot to add this documentary about 2D animation to my above post.

Fire away!

"Tell stories that matter to you, not stories that'll sell." - Stephen Tobolowsky

YouTube/Twitter/SG

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

Well, unless it's in 3D, isn't all animation in 2D? Since it's translated into 2D format whether stop motion or CGI?

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

dewfilms wrote:
Squash wrote:

Eh, are we talking about 2D animation in general or traditional animation?

Both are fair game in this discussion. 2D on a computer, traditional cel animation...pick away if you wish.

You can animate something alike cel animation on your computer. (Photoshop backgrounds have characters on transparant layers and show one layer save as frame 1).

2D will never be dead. I've heard that be able to draw and animate things in 2D is a requirement to be an animator in a big 3D animation firm.

It will never fully stop. 3D animation doesn't have some of the charm of 2D. I want to animate some 2D stuff myself using the computer method I explained above. I think 2D will never die. I also dislike that people compare it to 3D animation. Movies didn't kill the radio. TV didn't kill the Cinema. Mobile phones didn't kill the landline.

And 3D animation won't kill 2D animation.

"every day I feel more pleased that sigging isn't a thing anymore" - Squash
YOUTUBE | Will voice act, ping me in the discord.
03:52    Smeagol    I should send girls turds in a box
01:28    Smeagol    That signature leaves me wondering if I should be sending more girls more turds in boxes than I presently am

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

Cel has been reduced to niche market, but 2D animation will never die. However, if we're talking about quality of animation shows, then it's a bit of a different story.

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

I think I generally prefer 2D animation to 3D animation if it's for a film that is entirely animated, for reasons of what tends to be done with it stylistically. I suspect 2D animation of some kind will continue to be popular for television show purposes for a long time; hopefully films will continue to be made in the medium to some extent though 3D animation seems to have superseded it in the market right now.

http://i.imgur.com/wcmcdmf.png

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

mcoov wrote:

Cel has been reduced to niche market, but 2D animation will never die.

Dreamworks has no further plans to create anymore hand drawn (2D animated films).
As far as I'm aware, Blue Sky is sticking to CG films.

Disney has been tossing back and forth whether or not to create any more 2D animated features.
The question is whether or not Winnie the Pooh will be the last 2D animated feature for Disney if it does/doesn't profit at the box office.

"Tell stories that matter to you, not stories that'll sell." - Stephen Tobolowsky

YouTube/Twitter/SG

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

http://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/9895130472183446.jpg

2D animation will not die for a long, long time.

THAC XIV entry here: (Never) Meant To Be

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

It has been declining, but dead? No way, jose.

bricksinmotion member of the year

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

WelcomeToAwesomeness wrote:

It has been declining, but dead? No way, jose.

Yeah, but why is it/isn't it dead?

"Tell stories that matter to you, not stories that'll sell." - Stephen Tobolowsky

YouTube/Twitter/SG

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

People are lazy.  The fear campaign against Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and training in better work ergonomics, the production time to box office gross ratio of hand-drawn vs 3D animation, the manpower to a second of footage ratio, and of course these major animation studios catering to whichever gives them more dollar signs.  Most recent 2D animation I've seen is The Secret of Kells.  Made in USA?  No, Ireland.  The US based companies like Disney and Dreamworks care about what their immediate viewers want to see in animation.  As long as it's cheap explosions, ridiculous action sequences and shiny metal, they'll watch.  All that can be accomplished by not doing 2D.

Of course 1300 animators got laid off.  Why pay 1300 animators to hand-draw a feature animated film for 3 to 5 years when a mere 100 can generate a feature in 2?

What I can tell from your title post, Dew, is that Hollywood has moved on from 2D animation, that's all.  It's not dead because it's still being taught, for one.  It's still being done with or without the aid of a computer.  Fresco painters and landscape artists aren't gone.  They're just fewer in number.  Frescos aren't dead, their still being made.  History has shown that these so called "dead" arts manage to survive millenniums and are brought back in for contemporary usage.  It's not dead, it's been shelved.  Disney made it popular, that's all.  And like fashion trends, these art come and go.  You hear about cubism anymore?  No, but it'll come back someday.  And after the last nuclear missile launches and humanity is in its post-apocalyptic age, there will still be a marking stick and a surface to draw on and like cavemen drawings, isn't that how art started?

EDIT: I'm sure realist painters were worried about impressionist painters putting them out of work, too.

Last edited by Lechnology (July 7, 2011 (12:10am))

https://i.imgur.com/4b9NnS3.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/GUIl0qk.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/ox64uld.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/v3iyhE5.png

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

2D is still used for children's TV, and for some films outside of Hollywood ('The Illusionist' for example).

Therefore: Its not dead. 'Dead' is when its non-existent.

YouTube
Max, She/Her

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

dewfilms wrote:
mcoov wrote:

Cel has been reduced to niche market, but 2D animation will never die.

Dreamworks has no further plans to create anymore hand drawn (2D animated films).
As far as I'm aware, Blue Sky is sticking to CG films.

Disney has been tossing back and forth whether or not to create any more 2D animated features.
The question is whether or not Winnie the Pooh will be the last 2D animated feature for Disney if it does/doesn't profit at the box office.

Let's look at this from a different standpoint. TV shows are actually much easier to animate in two dimensions than in three. For one thing, access to programs like Flash or Toon Boom makes 2D animation much cheaper to produce. A show like (shudder) Mickey Mouse Clubhouse costs more man hours, computing power, and raw dollars than a show like My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic does, which is animated using Flash.
Another thing is that there are some things that can only really be accomplished in a 2D universe. Much higher levels of quality can be achieved using the same or less resources in a 2D universe than in a 3D universe, and much quicker. Budgets for TV shows are far lower than those for feature films, so can you imagine what an anvil would look like in a 3D TV show compared to a 2D TV show? It would look absolutely horrendous.
Watch this clip very carefully. Do you see the little swooshes emanating from just about anything that moves? That really can't be accomplished with 3D animation without some serious compromising.
2D animation has its limitations, but so does 3D. I've seen the new Roadrunner/Wile E. Coyote cartoons that are animated in 3D, and they are ridiculously horrendous (at least they're better than the rest of the show that they are a part of though (shudder shudder).

As for Cel animation, that is near-dead. I can only see independent/experimental filmmakers making those.

Last edited by mcoov (July 7, 2011 (02:22pm))

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

3D is already going out of fashion. I read an article about it and the general feeling was that unless they come up with a new development in it, then it will stay gimmicky.

Personally the glasses ruin the experience for me. 2D all the way.

'look like it was shot at 2 FPS by a blindfolded five year old boy with broken fingers and no thumbs.' -PushOver
I'll be back animating soon! Exams and computer faults are keeping me away </3

Drifter (THAC 11) - Here

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

Onion wrote:

3D is already going out of fashion. I read an article about it and the general feeling was that unless they come up with a new development in it, then it will stay gimmicky.

Personally the glasses ruin the experience for me. 2D all the way.

Umm, you should take off those 3D glasses and put on your reading ones. Re-read this thread when you have done.

Max Butcher wrote:

Therefore: Its not dead. 'Dead' is when its non-existent.

It's rather hard for things to become non-existent now. People on the internet can for communities based on small niches.

"every day I feel more pleased that sigging isn't a thing anymore" - Squash
YOUTUBE | Will voice act, ping me in the discord.
03:52    Smeagol    I should send girls turds in a box
01:28    Smeagol    That signature leaves me wondering if I should be sending more girls more turds in boxes than I presently am

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

Onion wrote:

3D is already going out of fashion. I read an article about it and the general feeling was that unless they come up with a new development in it, then it will stay gimmicky.

Personally the glasses ruin the experience for me. 2D all the way.

I personally like 3D but hate the glasses (especially because I have my actual glasses under them) but I personally think 3D is not going out of style. If you could see how many people walk into a 3D theater then a 2D theater. On tv, you see shows that are a little 3D like Micky Mouse Club House compared MLP (like mcoov mentioned earlier) that are 2D but more shows appear 2D. 2D just isn't dead.

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

Cartoonkid98 wrote:
Onion wrote:

3D is already going out of fashion. I read an article about it and the general feeling was that unless they come up with a new development in it, then it will stay gimmicky.

Personally the glasses ruin the experience for me. 2D all the way.

Umm, you should take off those 3D glasses and put on your reading ones. Re-read this thread when you have done.

To be honest I couldn't give a damn. Just thought I'd add something to the discussion, but obviously wasn't as the topic title implied.

Also: this doesn't mean I've come back. Jus' saying.

'look like it was shot at 2 FPS by a blindfolded five year old boy with broken fingers and no thumbs.' -PushOver
I'll be back animating soon! Exams and computer faults are keeping me away </3

Drifter (THAC 11) - Here

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

Onion wrote:
Cartoonkid98 wrote:
Onion wrote:

3D is already going out of fashion. I read an article about it and the general feeling was that unless they come up with a new development in it, then it will stay gimmicky.

Personally the glasses ruin the experience for me. 2D all the way.

Umm, you should take off those 3D glasses and put on your reading ones. Re-read this thread when you have done.

To be honest I couldn't give a damn. Just thought I'd add something to the discussion, but obviously wasn't as the topic title implied.

Also: this doesn't mean I've come back. Jus' saying.

You left?

Re: Is 2D Animation Dead?

Timothy R wrote:
Onion wrote:

Also: this doesn't mean I've come back. Jus' saying.

You left?

"every day I feel more pleased that sigging isn't a thing anymore" - Squash
YOUTUBE | Will voice act, ping me in the discord.
03:52    Smeagol    I should send girls turds in a box
01:28    Smeagol    That signature leaves me wondering if I should be sending more girls more turds in boxes than I presently am