Topic: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Hello,

I just wanted to show you something I found through a guy I watch weekly that always talks about news in Hollywood. Anyway, here's the thing. Warner Bros is basically planning on making a LEGO film, sadly using CGI. So, maybe those of you who like LEGO in a CGI form, or those who like those Lego Batman, Lego Indiana Jones, Lego Harry Potter & Lego Star Wars games may find this maybe interesting. I personally don't like the idea, as I'm not a fan of LEGO in a CGI form. I also don't really like the idea that the 'Australian company Animal Logic' signed up for the animation, as they did the animation for the two Happy Feet movies which I did not like at all. Well I just thought this could be an interesting topic to discuss.

-sfugity-

YouTube | Twitter 

http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h364/sfugity/bimTMIRABbanner_zps0970ba17.png
Currently going for the "Most Inactive" BiM award.

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

VERY, very sad day.

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Gross.

what could have been: jeffrey and the old man make some robots
                      art page -- tumblr --youtube
              bricksinmotion's #13th best curmudgeon

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

I'm actually tentatively interested in this. They've got one of the Robot Chicken dudes on board I believe. And in the case of Animal Logic, they do superb CG. I hated Happy Feet and I was indifferent about Guardians of Gahoole, but they both had sublime CG.

THAC XIV entry here: (Never) Meant To Be

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

This is a tragedy..... :'(

I'm working on getting my studio back up and running, so stay posted...

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Meh. A stopmotion one would have been cool but we all knew that that was never going to happen nowadays.

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

BricksInMotion.com: the LEGO movie website where the announcement that a professional, wide release LEGO movie is being made is met as a VERY, very sad tragedy.

http://i.imgur.com/wcmcdmf.png

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

^ this. Honestly this place is depressing nowdays.

THAC XIV entry here: (Never) Meant To Be

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Sounds familiar...

...but come on, even if the animation studio working on it doesn't have a stellar track record, it's the guys who wrote Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs and the director of Robot Chicken (who has some experience working with LEGO). Sounds like it's in good enough hands. And even if there is SOME live-action, it could be something like The Princess Bride, where it switches between the fantasy world, and a kid and his grandpa, so the LEGO bits might be 100% LEGO (albeit CGI).

Frankly, I'm excited for this movie, even if it might be a colossal failure.

"[It] was the theme song for the movie 2010 first contact." ~ A YouTuber on Also Sprach Zarathustra
CGI LEGO! Updated occasionally...

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Danimation wrote:

Meh. A stopmotion one would have been cool but we all knew that that was never going to happen nowadays.

I agree, they need to make more stop motion.

YouTube | Twitter 

http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h364/sfugity/bimTMIRABbanner_zps0970ba17.png
Currently going for the "Most Inactive" BiM award.

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Stop Motion, whilst an awesome medium, isn't the optimal choice for a lot of use in feature films for some fairly obvious reasons. Think of how long it takes the average 1 minute film in this community to be made. Even with a team of professionals, a feature length stop motion film takes ages to make and the truth is that Lego, as a medium for stop motion animation, is great for smaller scale projects but for a larger, longer one it would be far too constricting... There's a reason Aardman Studios and the Robot Chicken team use custom made figures.

Logistically, a feature length stop motion film is problematic and I can't see it happening. Not that I'd complain if it did mind you, I'm just aware of the unliklihood.

Just because this community tends to focus on stop motion animation isn't any reason to shun other techniques. As animators, shouldn't we always look to the future and embrace the idea that methods like CG do have their place, and WILL continue to improve?

Seriously dudes, lighten up. You're kicking the horse before it's even out of the gate.

Last edited by Siobhan (November 16, 2011 (06:20am))

THAC XIV entry here: (Never) Meant To Be

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

This still could be good.

Personally, I don't like CGI LEGO quite as much as stop-motion of course. Stop-motion being so awesome as it is. But There have still been some shorts made made by LEGO which I think were quite enjoyable. I'll wait til I hear more of this until judging it.

But, on the bright side, at least Hollywood is interested in LEGO to the point that they're making a movie about it. It may be CGI, but, it may be just one step closer to and epic feature stop-motion film. Something I've longed for a very long time.

As long as it's better than Clutch Powers.

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

AnnoyingNoisesProductions wrote:

As long as it's better than Clutch Powers.

Yes.

Though I wish it was stop-motion (as most of us do), I agree with Sean. At least they are recognizing Lego more, and be happy that they are using them as a medium (in CGI I mean).

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

I think that the medium offers a lot of creative possibilities, but judging (whether positively or negatively) it this close out of the gate is a mistake. I hope they take the premise in creative directions, as the body of toy-based Hollywood films is not exactly known for its stellar quality.

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Wile I have nothing against Animal Logic, I really wish WB had just made it stop motion animated. If they had, it really would have stood out in the flooded crowd of movies based on toys and what not..

Also, I laughed when i read they were making a movie about Carmen San-Diego. I just know Micheal Bay will sign on to direct.

Last edited by Sonjira (November 16, 2011 (01:16pm))

https://i.imgur.com/gGaR9Oz.png
Youtube @TheRealSonjira I consider it a personal defeat if my pee is not perfectly clear every time.]

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Well there has always been Wallace & Gromit, which must be much harder to animate, as it's clay. Although I agree with ANP that at least this prject could be a step closer to something epic with LEGOs. Becuase maybe, if this project actually turned out good enough, then more people would maybe consider making more films with LEGOs.

YouTube | Twitter 

http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h364/sfugity/bimTMIRABbanner_zps0970ba17.png
Currently going for the "Most Inactive" BiM award.

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Sean wrote:

Stop Motion, whilst an awesome medium, isn't the optimal choice for a lot of use in feature films for some fairly obvious reasons. Think of how long it takes the average 1 minute film in this community to be made. Even with a team of professionals, a feature length stop motion film takes ages to make and the truth is that Lego, as a medium for stop motion animation, is great for smaller scale projects but for a larger, longer one it would be far too constricting... There's a reason Aardman Studios and the Robot Chicken team use custom made figures.

Logistically, a feature length stop motion film is problematic and I can't see it happening. Not that I'd complain if it did mind you, I'm just aware of the unliklihood.

Just because this community tends to focus on stop motion animation isn't any reason to shun other techniques. As animators, shouldn't we always look to the future and embrace the idea that methods like CG do have their place, and WILL continue to improve?

Seriously dudes, lighten up. You're kicking the horse before it's even out of the gate.

I can see your point. It is definitely a lot harder to make a stop motion movie then a CG animated one. And I am not sure if WB is up for taking chances at the moment, especially after Green Lantern.

https://i.imgur.com/gGaR9Oz.png
Youtube @TheRealSonjira I consider it a personal defeat if my pee is not perfectly clear every time.]

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Sonjira wrote:

And I am not sure if WB is up for taking chances at the moment, especially after Green Lantern.

True story.

YouTube | Twitter 

http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h364/sfugity/bimTMIRABbanner_zps0970ba17.png
Currently going for the "Most Inactive" BiM award.

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Well, nowadays people hardly use stop-motion for feature-length professional films anymore. It's mainly because CGI allows for more control and bigger sets. In the case of Lego, minifigs have more joints and a greater range of movement than real minifigs. Stop-motion is good for us, but it's not the best choice for professional movie-makers.

Not literally dead, just no longer interested in Lego or animation.

Re: Warner Bros Greenlights CGI Live-Action Lego Movie

Tobias wrote:

Well there has always been Wallace & Gromit, which must be much harder to animate, as it's clay.

Not in the grand scheme of things for a team of professional animators. Their characters are more than just clay - they have complete armatures (skeletons) inside them. With Lego, characters, sets and whatnot are confined to the possibilities of Lego. Want a character to walk at a specific speed, with a specific length in his strides? With Aardman style puppets, no problem. With Lego, too bad - you have to make him walk on studs and even if you go to the trouble of animating him on a smooth surface, you've only got tiny legs with only one articulation point to work with. Hardly an optimal choice for professionals.

Sonjira wrote:

It is definitely a lot harder to make a stop motion movie then a CG animated one. And I am not sure if WB is up for taking chances at the moment, especially after Green Lantern.

Not only is it harder, but it's a lot more expensive due to the time and niche talent it requires which make your second point more relevant.

THAC XIV entry here: (Never) Meant To Be