Wow. Y'know; I didn't expect the second part to actually be BETTER. But there you have it.
The whole sequence within the Orphanage was better than the entire of Series 5. My only wish was that the entire episode was based around it. But noooo...
I'm just going to say it: the scenes with Nixon were INTOLERABLE. I was, no jokes, watching this guy through my fingers. He is not President Nixon - he looks nothing like Nixon, he sounds nothing like Nixon. If it wasn't for the fact they called him Nixon, I would be wondering why they had let a terrible actor on set.
Moffat clearly has never been to America. This whole two parter is insulting to Americans. On behalf of England: I apologise. I complain that America stereotypes us as tea-drinking snobs, but Moffat stereotypes Americans as over-patriotic a$$holes. Every time Nixon walks into a room, we get that bloody fanfare and everyone is like "GOD BLESS AMERICA!!" and Nixon is like "DO THIS FOR YOUR COUNTRY!!" and I'm like: "MOFFAT YOU IDIOT!!". And WHY do we even need to see the President? What is the relevance of the scenes with the President? Did we really need that scene where he was captured only to be released by the President? What did it contribute - apart from being one of the most insulting things I have ever seen in my life! And I sat through 'Batman and Robin'!
What makes it more insulting is that the episode could have been fantastic. The premise is there, there are some really good scenes, there are some really interesting sub-plots. Yet, its stuff like this that reminds me why I hated every Moffat-Written Episode of Series 5.
The opening is a mess. Moffat tries to be edgy and open up a two parter by cutting to several months later. Yep, that brilliant twist where Amy shoots the girl...just brushed aside. All we get is a really brief flashback showing them running. We then cut to Amy running from some Land-Rovers (which is stupid, since they would have caught up with her in about five seconds), in..Utah? But is cornered by a terrifying FEW FEET DROP!! Which is stupid, since she could literally just jump down and be fine.
We then go to River...in New York? Wow, that jump in time and location was so abrupt I got whiplash. She predictably jumps off the Empire State building....because she pretty much knows that Moffat will pull something out of his butt. I love how even the characters are aware that they are aided with the power of plot convenience.
Then we cut to Rory...in Arizona (I think, I cant remember that well)? STOP JUMPING AROUND!! I have no time to take in what has happened before we jump to a completely different event in a completely different location.
And we cut to a secret military base. STOP IT!! And, it turns out that the evil FBI agent was working for them all this time!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdhhQhqi_AE
Wait...that makes no sense. Why did he need to pretend that they were against them? If the Doctor has permission from THE FREAKING PRESIDENT then surely he doesn't need to work 'undercover'! Why did they even capture him if the President (and no doubt the secret service) knows he is friendly!?! They are LEGALLY ALLOWED to investigate!! Do you realise the amount of time and effort saved if you just ran off and searched straight away?? The whole 'undercover' sub-plot is, like most things in this episode, POINTLESS!!!
And....your not going to believe this...all these events take place BEFORE THE EPISODE HAS BEGUN!!! This is all a pre-credit sequence! This has got to be the worst opening ever. Its so rushed, so jumpy, and so pointless! I was expecting an Edgar Wright transition in between each sequence - only 'Spaced' and 'The Three Flavours of Cornetto Trilogy' were not a SF Television serial! They were comedies and the fast pacing adds to the humour! This just confused me! Sure, its sort of explained later, but I actually had to re-wind (thank god for Sky+) and watch it again because I had no idea what just happened. The good and consistent pacing of the previous episode...GONE! And straight after the credits, the episode slows down again. Its like Moffat thought "Oh crap! How am I supposed to show all that! Well, I could just remove the undercover sub-plot because...well....it doesn't make any sense, but I can instead condense it all into 5 mins! GENIUS!!"
Oh yeah, and that scene where Amy takes a picture of the Alien on her phone....POINTLESS!! We never see the picture again!
And, as it turns out, that WAS the ship from 'The Lodger'. Yeah....I just lost 100 credibility points. But, to be fair, it just a throwaway gag. What is the relevance of it being the ship from the Lodger? Is it really so important? Did the events of this episode have any impact within 'The Lodger'? POINTLESS!!
However, as I said, the sequence in the orphanage was outstanding. The narrative changes to where we see the story from the characters perspective - and whenever the Mutant Robert Palmers attack (THEY ARE NOT SCARY!! THEY ARE HILARIOUS!!), we dont see it, but we discover and notice the loss of time and memory. Its difficult to explain, but its nothing short of genius. Honestly: wouldn't this two-parter be so much better if the whole thing was done like this? I think Moffat missed a brilliant opportunity here to be really creative.
Really, if the whole thing was like that sequence, this would have been brilliant. As it stands, its just good. Its better than the first part, but the opening lets it down.
Oh, and its hinted that Amy is pregnant with the Doctors baby. Ew. Thats something out of perverted fanfiction - not a serious story arc. Also, I'm just imagining parents having to try and explain how Amy became pregnant....and laughing very hard......
Cartoonkid wrote:Her future is the Doctors past. So it's most likely a later life version of her.
Actually: her past is the Doctors future. The whole idea is that as the Doctor goes forward in time, River Song goes back in time. We saw River Songs death when the Doctor first met her, and she know of all their future encounters (apart from the Doctors Death....for some reason...). By logic, she hasn't witnessed the Pandorica open yet - therefore does not have the time-jumper. At least...that's how its was MEANT to go....
And if her time-line is actually completely random: then I dont think anyone in the world will be able to understand this plot-point.
Last edited by Max Butcher (May 1, 2011 (02:03am))