Re: What was the last movie you watched?
Constantine
Love this movie for some reason. I understand why fans of the comic might disapprove of it, but I love it.
I love it ![]()
"What the heck is this underwear business?" -- BertL
Bricks in Motion
We are a friendly filmmaking community devoted to the art of stop-motion animation using LEGO® and similar construction toys. Here, you can share your work, join our community of other brickfilmers, and participate in periodic animation contests!
A place to discuss, share, and create stop motion films.
Ad
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Constantine
Love this movie for some reason. I understand why fans of the comic might disapprove of it, but I love it.
I love it ![]()
"This is Constantine... John Constantine... A$shole"
Badass.
Avatar
Oh boy.....
Well, if you remove all the hype, its enjoyable. Its a movie that skips being good and tries too hard to be genius - ignoring basic and simple things that need to be right before the movie can be considered a classic. It also uses so many clichés I was expecting Jake's dad to be the corporation guy. But the music is really good, and the action is decent (overlooking all the clichés and the knife wielding mech) Its a popcorn movie at its very best.
However, this movie is CRAP compared to what it claims to be. Visually, its ground breaking - but pretty images only get you so far. A story carries a movie, not visual effects. I tried to keep a count on unnecessary eye-candy shots. They should have had text over these scenes saying "THIS MOVIE IS THE MOST AWESOME THING YOU WILL EVER ENCOUNTER IN YOUR LIFE!! MARVEL AT ITS INCREDIBLE EFFECTS!! JAMES CAMERON IS GOD!! THIS MOVIE IS AWESOME!! DID I MENTION THIS MOVIE IS AWESOME!!"
At times it gets ridiculous. Do we really need to see the entire journey to the place of the bat-things? There is no exposition (which the movie needs) no development (which the movie needs) just five minutes of pointless eye candy. I know your trying to create atmosphere - but you've got enough TWO SCENES LATER, and you had atmosphere about THREE SCENES AGO before your Rocky-Montage (the only thing missing was some 80's power music) And the montage actually has more eye candy than Jake lifting dumbbells and doing press-ups. Its so ridiculous its hilarious.
And there is science fiction, and then there is bullcrap. Mystical flying mountains? Mental links into living creatures? (what happens if you connect your USB hair with someone else's USB hair? Is it like Na'vi sex?) And what are those Jellyfish flower things that surround Jake? What does it mean if they surround you? Why wont anyone explain?
Why do they instantly think Jake is dangerous? He looks exactly like everyone else! Doe he just smell funny? Why is it that out of an entire planet, there is only one tree that has the expensive stuff? What does the stuff do? Where is Pandora? AND WHY DOESN'T JAKE JUST TELL EVERYONE THE BIG BAD HUMANS ARE COMING!?! He looks so shocked when they arrive, but he's had weeks! Why is our protagonist a big hairy IDIOT?! And why does the Na'vi whore suddenly start to like Jake? One moment she's slapping him across the face, the next their making out in the mystical tree-thingy?? Did I miss something?
And don't get me started on the two antagonists. You have that guy who plays an annoying, arrogant jacka$$ boss in every movie he is in - who is so clichéd he has HIS OWN PUTTING RUN so that we know instantly he's a jacka$$. Because its not obvious enough already! And then you have every bada$$ general in every movie rolled into one and then crapped out. This guy is like "I like my scars...their kinda pretty dontcha think?" and as if he's not obvious enough, you get him giving lectures saying stuff like "YOUR NOT IN KANSAS ANYMORE!!" and "WE'RE FIGHTING FEAR WITH FEAR" (WHAT FEAR??) I think Cameron spent ten years thinking of all the ways he can make both these guys as over the top as possible.
And the story......I fart better stories. 'Iron Man' had a better script, and each scene from that movie was written ten minutes before it was shot - not ten years. Sure, the concept of 'Avatars' is interesting, but its not exploited and its more flawed than the economy. Surely someone would have noticed Jakes lifeless body lying around somewhere? And I thought it was implied that the Na'vi (VERY ORIGINAL NAME FOR BLUE PEOPLE BY THE WAY) that they knew he was being controlled remotely. Surely they know that the other woman is an Avatar, which is why they wont let her speak? Why else wont they let her speak? And the other Avatar is a waste of animation, no lasting impact other than the fact he leaves no lasting impact.
But I'm kicking a dead horse here. Many people accuse 'District 9' of being unoriginal - but that movie is like 'Star Wars' in its concept. It takes every idea done before and yet by doing this somehow creates something entirely new. This movie however just fails at everything other than visuals and music - but even the music is clichéd with long chords during the typical slow motion shot where EVERYONE DIES, children's choirs during any scene with eye candy (which is a lot) to emphasise its beauty and innocence, and tribal music to show how the Na'vi are basic in their ways despite the fact they have a GOD ON THEIR SIDE!!
A god that listens to someone's prayers? Rubbish! (Religious flame war in 5...4....3...2....1....)
Oh, and James Cameron even rips his own idea off by getting a popular female singer to do a theme tune for his movie - as if he thinks it will make the movie instantly better than 'Titanic'. However, the song is without a doubt the most easily forgotten song in the world. I forgot how the verse went before the chorus started - and I cant even remember that now.
Lets hope everyone just forgets about the entire movie. I'm going to start right now.
-MRB
Avatar
Got the DVD, never got around to watching it at the cinema so this is my first viewing. Before I get to the film, I can't say I like the front cover of the dvd, the face of the na'vi zoomed in on looks pretty weird....
Now onto the film (:D), the visuals were stunning. The surroundings were beautiful. The acting was quite decent as so was the score, but as like many of you have said, the story let it down. The concept of avatars is pretty cool (I can't say it's unbelievably original, I always had the idea of turning into a creature of some sort and entering a different dimension, but in this case it was a planet). As Max says, there are some niggles. I completely agree with his point, wouldn't someone notice that Jake's avatar was dysfunctional? I mean later in the story it implies that both planets run on the same time, as when Jake was just about to get run over by that machine he changes back into his avatar and saves himself, so wouldn't that mean he would be dysfunctional for hours and hours? When he was taking a break from being an avatar and going about as a human, wouldn't some na'vi have noticed his lifeless body? It all seems slightly flawed.
The character development wasn't really that solid either. At the end, I didn't really care for some people dieing. It was like, "oh he's dead then?"
It would be nice to know more about the na'vi and some more information on Jake. I may of missed it, but did they tell us how he got in a wheel chair, or why he wanted to step into his brother's shoes?
With all the hype that this film gained, I was just left a tad disappointed. The visual effects were excellent, and the battle at the end was pretty neat. Also, didn't everyone kind of die at the same time? I mean that woman flying the helicopter and Tsu'tey died in seconds, it didn't build up much suspense imo. Overall I enjoyed it and thought it was great yes, I just think it could of been better and lived up to the hype. I may of made some mistakes in this as I've only seen it once
.
Oh, in my hate (which was as always slightly uncalled for) I forgot:
Monty Python: And Now For Something Completely Different
It was hilarious. Though, I do prefer the original 'Flying Circus' Sketches, but the movie adapts the sketches in a different and interesting way (particularly the great merging of the Parrot Sketch and the Lumberjack song. And I always crack up on the line "THIS....IS AN EX-PARROT!!")
It knows what it is and it doesn't try to improve. Its miraculously low budget production design makes it unique and very 'Impaired-esque'. Its shocking to realise how much I base MSI off of Monty Python by accident.
-MRB
Last edited by Max Butcher (May 7, 2010 (12:14pm))
Avatar
Lets hope everyone just forgets about the entire movie. I'm going to start right now.
-MRB
Good luck with that. You're the only one hoping, it seems. ![]()
lord of the rings the two towers! That movie rocks! I watched it more as 5 times...
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
Ha, and people thought that a movie about alien robots that transform into cars and fight each other would have depth.
Max, I can respect that you dislike Avatar, I really can. But that's probably the single worst analysis I've seen on it.
And there is science fiction, and then there is bullcrap. Mystical flying mountains? Mental links into living creatures?
I don't see the problem with the floating mountain/hair queue thing. This is not only just sci-fi, but fantasy as well, you can cut it a little slack. And, for the record, for the record, Pandora has lower gravity (as mentioned by Quaritch), and I think the Unobtanium deposits in the ground cause a magnetic field that lift parts of the planet up (which also would explain why the helicopter gadets go offline in that area).
what happens if you connect your USB hair with someone else's USB hair? Is it like Na'vi sex?)
Is it that difficult to infer? Having had a few examples of the connection of Na'vi-to-beast interaction and that it seemingly connects both creatures on a sort of nervous-system-type way, I assume that there's probably a level of intimacy to it when a couple connects.
And what are those Jellyfish flower things that surround Jake? What does it mean if they surround you? Why wont anyone explain?
Were you paying attention at all? Neytiri partly explains it, but the movie also sort of relies on you to determine their significance to the Na'vi based on her immediate reaction (both when the sprites land on Jake and when it lands on the end of her arrowhead).
Do we really need to see the entire journey to the place of the bat-things?
Given that this is a movie whose appeal lies in the overall visual and aural experience, I wouldn't blame James Cameron for wanting to take the time to explore his own planet, if only for that sake.
Why do they instantly think Jake is dangerous? He looks exactly like everyone else! Doe he just smell funny?
Again, were you paying even the slightest bit of attention? This wasn't the first time the Na'vi have encountered Avatars before. Plus, notice how Jake was clothed like a human, had five fingers (as opposed to the regular 4), spoke a different accent, didn't know the Na'vi language, etc. Doesn't take a genius to figure out he's an Avatar working with the humans.
For a guy who complains that Avatar's story is too simple and unoriginal, a lot of this seems to have gone way over your head.
Why is it that out of an entire planet, there is only one tree that has the expensive stuff? What does the stuff do? Where is Pandora?
It's not that Hometree is the only source of the mineral, it's just that it sits on top of the biggest deposit on the planet. Of course they'd go after it.
It's a fake planet, bro. Do you really think that pointing out where the galaxy is in the universe would have the slightest bit of relevance to anything?
AND WHY DOESN'T JAKE JUST TELL EVERYONE THE BIG BAD HUMANS ARE COMING!?! He looks so shocked when they arrive, but he's had weeks! Why is our protagonist a big hairy IDIOT?!
This part's a bit shaky, yeah. But, then again, don't forget that Jake starts out working for the military by giving them reconnaissance on Hometree's structure. The Na'vi likely would have killed him on the spot if they figured out he was giving them up (which they almost do when he admits it. The only reason Jake and Grace live is because of the attack on Hometree).
And why does the Na'vi whore suddenly start to like Jake? One moment she's slapping him across the face, the next their making out in the mystical tree-thingy?? Did I miss something?
Yes, the entire middle-section of the film.
And don't get me started on the two antagonists. You have that guy who plays an annoying, arrogant jacka$$ boss in every movie he is in - who is so clichéd he has HIS OWN PUTTING RUN so that we know instantly he's a jacka$$. Because its not obvious enough already! And then you have every bada$$ general in every movie rolled into one and then crapped out. This guy is like "I like my scars...their kinda pretty dontcha think?" and as if he's not obvious enough, you get him giving lectures saying stuff like "YOUR NOT IN KANSAS ANYMORE!!" and "WE'RE FIGHTING FEAR WITH FEAR" (WHAT FEAR??) I think Cameron spent ten years thinking of all the ways he can make both these guys as over the top as possible.
This is a bit more understandable, but then again, this isn't a really unique storyline. A story like this calls for villains we have to come to hate, and the movie at least accomplishes that (this is a very good vs. evil type deal).
About the "fight terror with terror" quote, I think that's sort of supposed to be a rip on George Bush. That was a bit too obvious for my liking, yeah.
And the story......I fart better stories. 'Iron Man' had a better script, and each scene from that movie was written ten minutes before it was shot - not ten years.
It was the technology that took that long, not the script treatment. Plus, though a lot of the dialogue in Iron Man was improvised, I assume they had an outline of what they wanted for each scene going into it.
Sure, the concept of 'Avatars' is interesting, but its not exploited and its more flawed than the economy. Surely someone would have noticed Jakes lifeless body lying around somewhere? And I thought it was implied that the Na'vi (VERY ORIGINAL NAME FOR BLUE PEOPLE BY THE WAY) that they knew he was being controlled remotely.
The Na'vi know they're fake, which is why they are hesitant to trust them. Being that they're not very technology-savvy, I wouldn't expect them to know the specifics of how they're made/controlled, only that they are fake creatures (as evidenced when Jake passes out and Tsu'tey almost slashes his throat immediately after). What's your point?
Surely they know that the other woman is an Avatar, which is why they wont let her speak? Why else wont they let her speak?
Knowing that she is a "fake" Na'vi who lives/works with the humans, I don't imagine why they would have any reason to fully trust her.
But I'm kicking a dead horse here. Many people accuse 'District 9' of being unoriginal - but that movie is like 'Star Wars' in its concept. It takes every idea done before and yet by doing this somehow creates something entirely new.
Are you implying that Star Wars has an original storyline? And Avatar didn't do this by creating its own species, planet, language, animals, plant-life, etc., just like what Star Wars did on a more universal scale?
Oh, and James Cameron even rips his own idea off by getting a popular female singer to do a theme tune for his movie - as if he thinks it will make the movie instantly better than 'Titanic'. However, the song is without a doubt the most easily forgotten song in the world. I forgot how the verse went before the chorus started - and I cant even remember that now.
That I can agree with you on.
Last edited by MindGame (May 7, 2010 (07:18pm))
That's got to be the longest post I have ever seen.
Were you paying attention at all?
Yes, I was.
But here is my point - a movie shouldn't need to be analysed and watched over and over again to be understood. Movies should be digestible in one go. Normally I only even need to watch a movie once to fully understand it. And I went into watching this movie again with an open mind determined to be proven wrong and come back here saying "This movie is actually pretty good". I had all the questions ready to be answered....but they were not.
Sure, when you analyse them and use LOTS of logic, you can draw a very vague answer - which I tried to do. But I don't want vague answers. I don't want forums of people debating over what those jellyfish things mean - you should know what they mean right away. Many people complain 'The Dark Knight' had too much exposition, but I like that because NOTHING IS QUESTIONED. You can walk out of the movie feeling good because you fully understand and therefore enjoy the movie without spending hours thinking about it or being a rocket scientist. It gave you all the answers without shoving it in your face or being patronising, yet made it as digestible and easy as possible. It annoys the hell out of me when you have to stop the movie, re-wind (Which I DID DO on several occasions) and watch again to try and understand it. Then you sit there with Sam Worthington's hairy head paused in mid-speech and actually have to think about it.
Never have I ever had to do that in a movie. You shouldn't have to think about and analyse it like your Einstein, you should be able to walk out of the movie the first time round and be able to understand it. Thats what I hate about this movie so much. That despite how much I don't like it, I have to put so much effort into it. Its like Maths. I HATE MATHS - yet I'm having to put more effort into passing it than any other subject I am doing.
This isn't enjoyable. A movie is an escape from reality, an opportunity to clear your mind, relax, and enjoy. But this movie is a CHORE. Its like doing homework. Its not an escape, its a return to reality. Why do I need to waste my time trying to understand this movie?
Neytiri partly explains it
Does she? I swear all she says is something like "There was a sign!" Sure, we know their a sign now - but what does the sign mean? We know Na'vi are buried with one of them, which tells us.....nothing.
This wasn't the first time the Na'vi have encountered Avatars before. Plus, notice how Jake was clothed like a human, had five fingers (as opposed to the regular 4), spoke a different accent, didn't know the Na'vi language, etc. Doesn't take a genius to figure out he's an Avatar working with the humans.
Yes, you can use logic, and I understand why you would be suspicious because he's wearing different clothes (and I never noticed he had five fingers. I know your probably going to slap me round the face and call me a moron for not noticing, but why should I have to go into all the effort of pausing the movie and pressing my face against the screen? Surely they should have pointed it out, like "He is not one of us, look! *holds up Jakes hand* he has five fingers!")
But:
The Na'vi know they're fake, which is why they are hesitant to trust them. Being that they're not very technology-savvy, I wouldn't expect them to know the specifics of how they're made/controlled, only that they are fake creatures (as evidenced when Jake passes out and Tsu'tey almost slashes his throat immediately after). What's your point?
The thing is, if the Na'vi knew Jake was an Avatar.....why are they so shocked when he collapses lifeless? Why is Neytiri so worried when Jake wont wake up? Why is everyone so shocked that the other woman (keep forgetting her name, sorry) also falls lifeless? Why wouldn't they just kill Jake on the spot if they knew what he was?
My point is: I have no clue if the Na'vi know or not! There is your logic which says they already know, but their is my logic which says they don't know until the general stops the project. Your logic makes sense to a degree, but I believe mine does too because I'm an arrogant twit. So which is right? This would all be solved with just one or two extra lines of dialogue. Why does this movie need to be so cryptic?
Yes, the entire middle-section of the film.
If by middle section you mean 'Rocky-Montage' (which is basically the entire 'Middle' of the movie). But yeah, they did seem to be bonding during the montage. I take back that complaint.
I think the Unobtanium deposits in the ground cause a magnetic field that lift parts of the planet up (which also would explain why the helicopter gadgets go off-line in that area).
Did you research that? If you did, I would like to know the website. Either that or your just clever - unlike me.
Are you implying that Star Wars has an original storyline? And Avatar didn't do this by creating its own species, planet, language, animals, plant-life, etc., just like what Star Wars did on a more universal scale?
No. I'm implying that Star Wars took every idea already done and somehow made it into something fresh and fun. Sure, its unoriginal, but....it just works. I have no idea why, it just does. Avatar doesn't work. Star Wars was just trying to get a cinema release - Avatar tries so desperately to be the greatest movie of all time. The problem is it tries way too hard.
And I used to have my own fantasy/Sci-Fi world. I even had an entire wall of my room covered in sketches of Animals, plant life, space ships, planets etc. Sure, it was the most unoriginal in the world, but I'm sure if I returned to them now I could make a few alterations here and there and BINGO - I present to you: Avatar! Now lets release it on DVD without any features! $$
Oh, and anyone can come up with nonsense and claim it to be a different language. Ben Stiller spoke better Na'vi-ish...and that was improvised on the spot. And yes, the same could be said for Star Wars.....but that....just.....worked. It was just used right and this was used wrong.
Your other explanations I get and accept. I understand that in my rage I get carried away, and I apologise. This is why I'm NOT a film critic...
-MRB
Last edited by Max Butcher (May 8, 2010 (03:54am))
This isn't enjoyable. A movie is an escape from reality, an opportunity to clear your mind, relax, and enjoy. But this movie is a CHORE. Its like doing homework. Its not an escape, its a return to reality. Why do I need to waste my time trying to understand this movie?
-MRB
I felt 'escaped'. It's science fiction; it's not real. I escaped from reality and to be honest, I didn't question many things. I guess that's just because I enjoyed the film casually...
The movie was long, and it takes a compelling story to keep me interested, not spiffy special effects.
I felt 'escaped'. It's science fiction; it's not real.
Science fiction is a genre of fiction. It differs from fantasy in that, within the context of the story, its imaginary elements are largely possible within scientifically established or scientifically postulated laws of nature
For the record, my complaints with 'Avatar' are:
1. The movie either severely lacks subtlety....or is cryptically subtle
2. The story is horribly told, made of 100% cliché, prioritizes pointless eye-candy over plot, and the only thing original is the concept of 'Avatars'
3. Its stupidly overrated and nothing compared to what it claims to be
4. It tries so hard to be a classic that it skips the basic elements that make a movie good
5. WHY DO WE HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL NOVEMBER FOR A SPECIAL EDITION AND WHY IS IT BEING RE-RELEASED IN CINEMAS WHEN THE DVD IS ALREADY OUT AND IT ONLY STOPPED SHOWING TWO MONTHS AGO!!?!?!?!?!
-MRB
Last edited by Max Butcher (May 8, 2010 (04:34am))
Rocky
I sorta expected some sort of ego trip movie for Stallone, but it goes really deep into the character of Rocky. And you really want to root for him in the end.
Great movie and can't wait to check out the sequel.
4/5
Cloverfield
The Blair Witch Project with a huge budget, GREAT combination! ![]()
This movie is perfect in every standard, it's just perfect.
JJ.Abrams knows good moviemaking.
5/5
The Wolf Man (1941)
I love this movie.
MindGame wrote:Were you paying attention at all?
Yes, I was.
But here is my point - a movie shouldn't need to be analysed and watched over and over again to be understood. Movies should be digestible in one go. Normally I only even need to watch a movie once to fully understand it. And I went into watching this movie again with an open mind determined to be proven wrong and come back here saying "This movie is actually pretty good". I had all the questions ready to be answered....but they were not.
Sure, when you analyse them and use LOTS of logic, you can draw a very vague answer - which I tried to do. But I don't want vague answers. I don't want forums of people debating over what those jellyfish things mean - you should know what they mean right away. Many people complain 'The Dark Knight' had too much exposition, but I like that because NOTHING IS QUESTIONED. You can walk out of the movie feeling good because you fully understand and therefore enjoy the movie without spending hours thinking about it or being a rocket scientist. It gave you all the answers without shoving it in your face or being patronising, yet made it as digestible and easy as possible. It annoys the hell out of me when you have to stop the movie, re-wind (Which I DID DO on several occasions) and watch again to try and understand it. Then you sit there with Sam Worthington's hairy head paused in mid-speech and actually have to think about it.
Never have I ever had to do that in a movie. You shouldn't have to think about and analyse it like your Einstein, you should be able to walk out of the movie the first time round and be able to understand it. Thats what I hate about this movie so much. That despite how much I don't like it, I have to put so much effort into it. Its like Maths. I HATE MATHS - yet I'm having to put more effort into passing it than any other subject I am doing.
This isn't enjoyable. A movie is an escape from reality, an opportunity to clear your mind, relax, and enjoy. But this movie is a CHORE. Its like doing homework. Its not an escape, its a return to reality. Why do I need to waste my time trying to understand this movie?
Maybe it's just me and my super enhanced brain, but I understood the whole movie in one go.
Wow, I don't think I've ever seen anyone accuse Avatar of being too highbrow.
Posts [ 2,861 to 2,880 of 8,883 ]