Re: Sets and Props Critique Thread
Men O' War does a magnificent job of showing a waterfall and water in general.
- Aaron
Note: These days, community activity has largely moved to the BiM Discord. Join us!
Bricks in Motion
Bricks in Motion
We are a friendly filmmaking community devoted to the art of stop-motion animation using LEGO® and similar construction toys. Here, you can share your work, join our community of other brickfilmers, and participate in periodic animation contests!
A place to discuss, share, and create stop motion films.
Ad
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Men O' War does a magnificent job of showing a waterfall and water in general.
- Aaron
Here's a damaged carrier Helicopter. It's purposely like that. For my upcoming film
Obviously, I will mask out the supporting block.
Not bad at all. 
Not bad but it seems to... old
You guys are the most helpful. Ever.
No, really it seems like a WW2 chopper
No, really it seems like a WW2 chopper
Well, it is a damaged helicopter remember, and that's not crappy made up excuse. Read my post. It's not going to look super new. Look, the story is some spies stole it from The Russian enemies and there were attempts to destroy them. They luckily got away and are on their way to pick up the squad of our main characters. I'm uploading part 1 tomorrow hopefully. I'll be working on part 2 next weekend. It's going to requite lots of painful effort.
I just think even damaged you need to make it more colorful
Also BbB, remember;
The helicopters as you know them today, was really firstly made in the start of the 60's.
The helicopters from WWII was only in the testing, and they weren't safe at all.
Quite good work, even though it still needs some details.
Also the backend is borthering me a little. The tail-roter doesn't seem to be very convincing. Try to get another one.
And I still find it a little blocky; but this time in the good ol' LEGO Way. Which is pretty good! 
-Jack.
The waterfall is OK, but it will suck in the animation.
No offence, but if it doesn't move....
Meh.
The waterfall is OK, but it will suck in the animation.
No offence, but if it doesn't move....
Meh.
Lol someone better sig that.
The waterfall is OK, but it will suck in the animation.
No offence, but if it doesn't move....
Meh.
Well, wihen it is being animated, bricks could be moved around, and when it is edited, water spraying and falling could be added to look more realistic.
Pros:
-good structure
-keeps steady color scheme
-uses some earth tone colors]
Cons:
-fire hydrant is too large
-color scheme seems too large
-second floor windows appear odd
-no sidewalk to door
-sports car(make your own)]
Pros:]
Amazing color scheme.
I like the window on the second floor.]
Cons.
No Sidewalk.
The top of the roof has this grey thing hanging out if you can see it.
Some of the pieces don't seem to be put together tight enough. (mainly the roof)
]
other than that it's good
Okay, I created what I think would be a futuristic car for my upcoming "Cyrin High" film.
I have no clue why the image quality is so bad, I used my QuickCam 9000. Hmmmm. . .
I'm Really liking the back of the car but I think you need to change the windshield so it goes over the guy.
The tires...I don't think there lego?
I also think the front of the car should be more roundish.
I got the tires from the Lego Agents car. Any suggestions on how to make the windshield go over?
Posts [ 1,321 to 1,340 of 3,570 ]
