<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forums - Bricks in Motion - Extended signature limit]]></title>
		<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/topic/9349/extended-signature-limit/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Extended signature limit.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Extended signature limit]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198794/#p198794</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That's true, and there's already an email link right next to the PM link.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Living LEGO)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198794/#p198794</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Extended signature limit]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198755/#p198755</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Or just Youtube, Twitter, and Facebook. Email is in your profile.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[c00lasice11@gmail.com (coolasice11)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198755/#p198755</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Extended signature limit]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198754/#p198754</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[quote=Sméagol]There's no way you need that many links in your signature.  It's a signature, not a docking bay for links to every networking site you've registered for.  Sorry, but what it boils down to is that we don't want signatures longer than 400 characters.[/quote]
I agree. I think the most links a sig should have is 4: YouTube, Vimeo, Twitter, and email. I you really want thought, a 5th should be Facebook.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Living LEGO)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198754/#p198754</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Extended signature limit]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198743/#p198743</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you want those dimensions, just do 400x67. Smaller sigs are often more stylish.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[harry@bossert.com (Hazzat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198743/#p198743</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Extended signature limit]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198721/#p198721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wait, so you want this?

[img]http://bit.ly/efFca9[/img][url=http://bit.ly/fqkTuE][img]http://bit.ly/fhYPy2[/img][/url][url=http://bit.ly/eUTSCf][img]http://bit.ly/idPfxN[/img][/url][url=http://bit.ly/dTvTgQ][img]http://bit.ly/ifRAtR[/img][/url][url=callto://legodudez][img]http://bit.ly/i32I32[/img][/url][url=http://bit.ly/dVLbVp][img]http://bit.ly/e5mNAH[/img][/url][url=http://bit.ly/ebrnei][img]http://bit.ly/dIEzvz[/img][/url][url=http://bit.ly/fOZCsS][img]http://bit.ly/e2whUs[/img][/url]

That is just absurd.

But I would like a signature extension, I think the problem we worry about is the [i]height[/i] of the signature taking up a page, but extending it to 600 x 100 probably wouldn't do any damage to the site.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (RealBrick)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198721/#p198721</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Extended signature limit]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198630/#p198630</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Not to mention that links to several of the sites you want in your signature are built into your profile. Be selective.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Jargon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198630/#p198630</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Extended signature limit]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198615/#p198615</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There's no way you need that many links in your signature.  It's a signature, not a docking bay for links to every networking site you've registered for.  Sorry, but what it boils down to is that we don't want signatures longer than 400 characters.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Sméagol)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198615/#p198615</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Extended signature limit]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198594/#p198594</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The signature limit when doing long BBCode strands, isn't really enough. 636 Characters is the maximum for 4 lines dead on, so if you raised the limit to 500, or 600 characters it would be much appreciated.

If you are wondering what great long BBCode it is, it is this: 

[code][img]http://bit.ly/efFca9[/img][url=http://bit.ly/fqkTuE][img]http://bit.ly/fhYPy2[/img][/url][url=http://bit.ly/eUTSCf][img]http://bit.ly/idPfxN[/img][/url][url=http://bit.ly/dTvTgQ][img]http://bit.ly/ifRAtR[/img][/url][url=callto://legodudez][img]http://bit.ly/i32I32[/img][/url][url=http://bit.ly/dVLbVp][img]http://bit.ly/e5mNAH[/img][/url][url=http://bit.ly/ebrnei][img]http://bit.ly/dIEzvz[/img][/url][url=http://bit.ly/fOZCsS][img]http://bit.ly/e2whUs[/img][/url][/code]]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[brickflicks@gmail.com (zerowellies)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/198594/#p198594</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
