<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forums - Bricks in Motion - Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
		<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/topic/6074/higher-level-frameaveraging/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Higher level frame-averaging?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:45:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/135491/#p135491</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I only expected a few people to comment on this, thanks guys! :D I am comfortable with 10 and 15 at it so thanks! I might get a Logitech Quickcam Pro 9000 in December, so quality should get higher by then! Thank you guys again for the helpful info! 

-Tejas VIM Studios 

PS I will try to get halogen lamps soon, this might give more light thus making better lighting, also if you don't mind AncientBricks, could you post a picture of your setup?]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[vimstudios@gmail.com (VIMStudios)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/135491/#p135491</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/135461/#p135461</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[quote=AncientBricks]The more I think about it, the more I think the right number probably depends on how bright your shot is.  In really low light, images are much grainier and would therefore benefit more from having a much higher frame averaging rate.  Maybe I can get by with only using 5 when I'm working on bright shots.[/quote]
Good point. Usually, the more light comes into the webcam, the less grain there is to start with. Still, frame averaging will improve your picture quality.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (BertL)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/135461/#p135461</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/135253/#p135253</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The more I think about it, the more I think the right number probably depends on how bright your shot is.  In really low light, images are much grainier and would therefore benefit more from having a much higher frame averaging rate.  Maybe I can get by with only using 5 when I'm working on bright shots.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (AncientBricks)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/135253/#p135253</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/135146/#p135146</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think RevMen or someone else posted a frame averaging test years ago on BF. Turns out that between 10 and 20 you can't really see much improvement.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (BertL)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/135146/#p135146</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/134818/#p134818</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I use a QCPro9000 and usually use only 5 frames for averaging.  I've not observed that anything over 5 makes any noticeable improvement, especially when the captured frames are flying by at 15fps playback.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (AncientBricks)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/134818/#p134818</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/133261/#p133261</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No prob BG, thank you 0ldScratch! I right now have it set to 15 and I am pretty happy with its fastness. :D]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[vimstudios@gmail.com (VIMStudios)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/133261/#p133261</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/133251/#p133251</link>
			<description><![CDATA[:sweat:  Oops, I thought he said frame rate. My bad.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (BGanimations)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/133251/#p133251</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/133250/#p133250</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It makes each frame less grainy. It only makes your animation smoother in that there is no swirling grain on screen. I use 10 and that seems ample. Anything over that and you have to wait an incredibly long time between each frame as it takes a whole bunch of pictures.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (0ldScratch)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/133250/#p133250</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/133242/#p133242</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It makes the animation smoother, not the quality. The downside is you have to take many more frames for a bit smoother animation.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (BGanimations)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/133242/#p133242</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Higher level frame-averaging?]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/133182/#p133182</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey. in Stopmotion Pro 7 you can set your frame averaging level up to 20. Is this better the higher I put it? I use the QCK 4000 and plan on using it for some time, ( I want to first make a proper film before getting the fancy stuff like cams) So does it make quality better the higher I put it? 


-Tejas VIM]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[vimstudios@gmail.com (VIMStudios)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/133182/#p133182</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
