<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forums - Bricks in Motion - Improved 2013 Walk Cycles]]></title>
		<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/topic/16625/improved-2013-walk-cycles/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Improved 2013 Walk Cycles.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 12:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Improved 2013 Walk Cycles]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/297880/#p297880</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[url=http://www.bricksinmotion.com/forums/topic/11573/generic-walkrun-cycle-tests-thread/]*cough*[/url]]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (BertL)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 12:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/297880/#p297880</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Improved 2013 Walk Cycles]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/297859/#p297859</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh sorry, I still am not completely use to BIN. But I just posted wherever sorry about that. And thank you, and yeah I'll try to look at more tutorials to make it still a little better :)]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[jarrettvaters@gmail.com (jarrettvaters123)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/297859/#p297859</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Improved 2013 Walk Cycles]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/297858/#p297858</link>
			<description><![CDATA[May I ask why you posted this in both "Releases" and "WIPs/Tests"?
This thread gets it right, and it does belong here, but why post it twice?

1st and 2nd Walk tests, they're pretty good for missing any "between the studs" frame. The arm swinging is pretty smooth, and once you add the extra frame, you'll have a nice walk cycle. ;) 

Run Test, it went by fairly quickly, but I did notice that the guys arms didn't swing that much. Running cycles need more, not less, arm movement.

2nd Run, looked more like a walk, and again, there wasn't much arm movement.

3rd Walk, didn't look quite as good as the others, so whatever you did differently, don't do it.

Other than missing the "In between studs" frame, they're fairly good. There are a bazillion and a half walk cycle tutorials both here, and on Youtube, so I suggest that you go watch a few and use that knowledge to polish yours up that last little bit.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Pritchard Studios)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/297858/#p297858</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Improved 2013 Walk Cycles]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/297852/#p297852</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRU8CvgjL6g[/url]]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[jarrettvaters@gmail.com (jarrettvaters123)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 00:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/297852/#p297852</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
