<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forums - Bricks in Motion - Dark Lighting]]></title>
		<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/topic/16198/dark-lighting/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Dark Lighting.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:18:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dark Lighting]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/294002/#p294002</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The second shot looks great. Ready for colour grading and post!]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Siobhan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/294002/#p294002</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dark Lighting]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/294001/#p294001</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think it's fine the way it is, I could see fine. :)]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[backyardlegos@gmail.com (backyardlegos)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/294001/#p294001</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dark Lighting]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293922/#p293922</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[quote]Also, Sean is very right about it being better to shoot brighter, brightening in post almost always doesn't look as good, unless you have state of the art software, and even then the detail won't be as good. If you shoot bright enough that details are visible, in post you can adjust the lighting so it's dark, but the viewer can still see what's going on.[/quote]

So then would you say that the second video could still be brighter? I mean, I don't want it to look like it was completely darkened in post.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Jayko)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 03:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293922/#p293922</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dark Lighting]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293918/#p293918</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You can't get f/32 because the lens you're using can't close the aperture that far, in fact there are very few if any lenses that can get to f/32. As far as ISO goes, yes technically an ISO will give you a cleaner image than ISO 400; if your blowing up the photo to a poster half the size of your wall. Video is such a low resolution that a shot at ISO 800 and a shot at ISO 100 are going to look the same. Also, Sean is very right about it being better to shoot brighter, brightening in post almost always doesn't look as good, unless you have state of the art software, and even then the detail won't be as good. If you shoot bright enough that details are visible, in post you can adjust the lighting so it's dark, but the viewer can still see what's going on. :)]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[backyardlegos@gmail.com (backyardlegos)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 03:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293918/#p293918</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dark Lighting]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293904/#p293904</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Right. Well I've shot it again, this time with the settings Sean suggested:
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrA2PX4bzJ4[/url]

Too bright, of course, but then I guess I can easily tone it down in post. Are there any important modifications or factors that I should be aware of before going on and shooting the rest of the scene?]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Jayko)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 02:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293904/#p293904</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dark Lighting]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293848/#p293848</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[quote=Jayko]I did a test with my previously mentioned settings. Here the shot is without any editing:
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXLOSQqTDr8[/url]

So you're saying that it's wiser to shoot it too bright than too dark because it would be easier to darken the shot in post than brighten it, it that right?
[/quote]

That's what I do; I shoot [i]really[/i] bright, then tone down the brightness and contrast.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (CyberCom)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293848/#p293848</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dark Lighting]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293802/#p293802</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I did a test with my previously mentioned settings. Here the shot is without any editing:
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXLOSQqTDr8[/url]

So you're saying that it's wiser to shoot it too bright than too dark because it would be easier to darken the shot in post than brighten it, it that right?

[quote]Try animating with something along the lines of 1/2, f32, 400 (the 400 is the important one, experiment with the first two to find what works). Should give a good image and help prevent flicker.[/quote]

I usually animate with the ISO set to 200. Isn't that better? Doesn't lower give you a clearer image? That's what I've heard anyway. And I can't seem to get the f32 setting. f22 is as far as it will let me go with the others in place. As for lighting flicker, I haven't had a problem with that because I've been using this trick:  [url]http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2012/07/reducing-flicker-for-stop-motion-animation-and-time-lapse-photography.html[/url]]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Jayko)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293802/#p293802</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dark Lighting]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293738/#p293738</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Try animating with something along the lines of 1/2, f32, 400 (the 400 is the important one, experiment with the first two to find what works). Should give a good image and help prevent flicker.

As for lighting, I would suggest having the scene lit well enough that you can clearly see what's going on and the image capture is clean then pumping it down in post.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Siobhan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 04:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293738/#p293738</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dark Lighting]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293726/#p293726</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey guys. I'm just starting out on a new scene in a Brickfilm I'm doing where the room has to be very dark. ...[i]Very[/i] dark. While I have plenty of experience in the animation process (I've been silently animating this particular film for more than a year now), I'm not that experienced when it comes to post production and I've never really done a scene with this dark of lighting before. 

I'm just wonddering if it's better to set the lighting how I need in on set with the camera or leave it for post-production. Could anyone with experience tell me which is better? 

I'm using a Canon T2i with the kit lens. These pictures are how I now have it. The settings in these pictures are: 0"4 / f16 / 100 ISO

[url]http://www.flickr.com/photos/92160911@N05/8377645499/in/photostream[/url]

Please forgive my being technically unsavvy and not putting the pictures right up for you to see them. Thanks in advance for the advice. I always find you guys here on this site extremely helpful.]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Jayko)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/293726/#p293726</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
