<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forums - Bricks in Motion - New HD camera test]]></title>
		<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/topic/15810/new-hd-camera-test/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in New HD camera test.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:40:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New HD camera test]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/289826/#p289826</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[quote=asmashedsodacan]what would you suggest? a 15 fps or a 24 fps walk cycle?[/quote]
15 fps, with a 6-frame cycle (6 frames from 1 silhouette (a frame with the opposite leg in the same postion) to the next).

Also, the extremes (the furthest point something goes from the middle of an arc of movement) of the arm swing happen on the down postion (the frame with one foot back and the other straight). The arms oppose the legs (each arm approximately lines up with the leg on the opposite side).
It's best to start with the down postion because not only is it the extreme of the arm movement, but an extreme of the leg movements as well (the other extreme being the up postion, the frame where the head is highest).]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (minifig051)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/289826/#p289826</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New HD camera test]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/289821/#p289821</link>
			<description><![CDATA[thanks. 
yeah i thought of that too. the walk cycle is bad. i have to move the arms too. what would you suggest? a 15 fps or a 24 fps walk cycle?]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (asmashedsodacan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 00:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/289821/#p289821</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New HD camera test]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/289811/#p289811</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nice quality though. The walk cycle was a little bit rushed and it didn't like so good, becuase you didn't use arms at all in the cycle and the footstep-sound was bad, because the minifigure walked different rate than the sound. But as I said the quality is very nice. :)]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (:S Productions)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 18:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/289811/#p289811</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New HD camera test]]></title>
			<link>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/289791/#p289791</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Logitech HD Pro Webcam C920 Stop Motion Test. 

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hmy8ojd4Wk4[/url]]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (asmashedsodacan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/289791/#p289791</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
