<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forums - Bricks in Motion - 70409 Shipwreck Defense]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://bricksinmotion.com/forums/feed/atom/topic/20961/"/>
	<updated>2015-04-14T22:39:14Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/topic/20961/70409-shipwreck-defense/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 70409 Shipwreck Defense]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/344968/#p344968"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[[quote=Mr Vertigo]Well, I'm not sure it counts as a "film" in the most traditional sense, but there's some nice work here.  The quick-build and walk cycles are nicely animated and quite fun to watch.

However, I feel this falls awkwardly between being a "review" and a "brickfilm".  The backdrop/surrounding set is nicely built, but it makes it difficult to tell what comes with the set you're reviewing and what you've added from your own collection.  I also have to echo Rioforce in saying that the digital zooms look quite awkward and out of place, especially since you animated the previous part so nicely.  I have nothing against quickbuilds or reviews, but it looks as though you're trying to make both a film and a review, and the end result ends up being a bit of an awkward mash-up of both, in my opinion, with neither being especially strong.

Still, some nice work here.  You're a good animator, and I can't wait to see what you'll make next![/quote]


Thank you very much to take your time and give sincere opinion! Probably you have right. It's not 100% review but it's not the brickfilm. Maybe it's just some stop motion building. But after all I like what I do. When I started, I made one video just for fun and since one year I'm still evoluating and it' become something like that. I love make stop motion contruction piece by piece but I think that is a little boring so I started to put some minifigs animations. I like that my videos are one of a kind. And I don't want to change it. However it's interesting what you tell me about the digital zooms. I thought that's really cool. I wanted to show more details and made it more dynamic. What you propose instead ?]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Bricks Planet]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/132287/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-04-14T22:39:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/344968/#p344968</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 70409 Shipwreck Defense]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/344963/#p344963"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[Well, I'm not sure it counts as a "film" in the most traditional sense, but there's some nice work here.  The quick-build and walk cycles are nicely animated and quite fun to watch.

However, I feel this falls awkwardly between being a "review" and a "brickfilm".  The backdrop/surrounding set is nicely built, but it makes it difficult to tell what comes with the set you're reviewing and what you've added from your own collection.  I also have to echo Rioforce in saying that the digital zooms look quite awkward and out of place, especially since you animated the previous part so nicely.  I have nothing against quickbuilds or reviews, but it looks as though you're trying to make both a film and a review, and the end result ends up being a bit of an awkward mash-up of both, in my opinion, with neither being especially strong.

Still, some nice work here.  You're a good animator, and I can't wait to see what you'll make next!]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Mr Vertigo]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/127487/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-04-14T21:41:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/344963/#p344963</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 70409 Shipwreck Defense]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/344687/#p344687"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[Another nice tutorial, Bricks Planet! I really like your style, as I said on your previous review. Personally, I did not like the digital zooms you used in the end, I feel like in-camera zooms or pans would have worked better, but overall, I really liked it. :)]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rioforce]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/131977/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-04-09T22:28:31Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/344687/#p344687</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[70409 Shipwreck Defense]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/344573/#p344573"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[[url=https://bricksinmotion.com/films/view/6647]Directory Link[/url]

[b]70409 Shipwreck Defense[/b]

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhgNJtT_Xq8]YouTube[/url]
[url=http://www.facebook.com/BricksPlanet]facebook[/url]

Stop Motion review of Lego Pirates 70409 Shipwreck Defense]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Bricks Planet]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/132287/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-04-08T06:06:31Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/344573/#p344573</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
