<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forums - Bricks in Motion - C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://bricksinmotion.com/forums/feed/atom/topic/12037/"/>
	<updated>2011-10-12T19:19:48Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/topic/12037/c910-vs-qc9k/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/247151/#p247151"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[On all the videos I have seen, the C910 has worse quality than the Quickcam Pro 9000, yet people say it has better quality. I'm not sure which one to get. Please help.

I also heard that the focus has 10% increments, is this true?]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Aero_Studios]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/4501/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-12T19:19:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/247151/#p247151</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246761/#p246761"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[I don't mean to sound pushy, but, any progress on those pics?]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Aero_Studios]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/4501/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-09T14:39:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246761/#p246761</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246655/#p246655"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[[quote=coolasice11]Well, I know that the C910 works on Mac, but the QCP9k does not. I have both, so I'll upload some pics in a bit.[/quote]
I don't have a Mac. Thank you for taking your time to help.]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Aero_Studios]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/4501/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-08T15:34:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246655/#p246655</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246642/#p246642"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[Well, I know that the C910 works on Mac, but the QCP9k does not. I have both, so I'll upload some pics in a bit.]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[coolasice11]]></name>
				<email><![CDATA[c00lasice11@gmail.com]]></email>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/3013/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-08T14:08:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246642/#p246642</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246628/#p246628"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[[url=http://www.logitech.com/en-us/34/&view=34?compProducts=6816&A1=1&A2=2&A3=3&A4=4&compProducts=6333&A5=5&A6=6&A7=7&A8=8&A9=9&A10=10&A11=11&A12=12&A13=13&A14=14&A15=15&A16=16&A17=17&A18=18]Here[/url]]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Briks]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/4291/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-08T12:35:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246628/#p246628</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246626/#p246626"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[bump:

[b][u]Does anyone have any visual comparisons, please?[/u][/b]]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Aero_Studios]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/4501/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-08T12:27:24Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246626/#p246626</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246558/#p246558"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[I know a way of mounting it to a tripod. [b][u]Does anyone have any visual comparisons, please?[/u][/b]]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Aero_Studios]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/4501/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-07T16:09:28Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246558/#p246558</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246540/#p246540"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[I have used the C910.
I tried everything to keep it still, even tape didn't work.
I sold it on [url=http://www.finn.no]www.finn.no[/url], and bought a Microsoft Lifecam Studio, it worked better for me :)]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Briks]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/4291/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-07T12:14:44Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246540/#p246540</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246502/#p246502"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[[quote]C910 has better quailty, but a quite awkward base.[/quote]
The [i]base[/i]? Put the C910 in a cradle and it works awesome. I have it :P 

I prefer the C910 better than the QC9K. A lot of great animators use the QC9K but to get the great color quality you have to "play around" with the settings :/ Its probably the same for the C910. :P 

-FBS]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Mjolnir]]></name>
				<email><![CDATA[gfp@riskassess.no]]></email>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/3216/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-06T19:25:50Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246502/#p246502</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246482/#p246482"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[C910 has better quailty, but a quite awkward base.
The 9k is more popular, and the base is much easier to handle.]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Briks]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/4291/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-06T14:55:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246482/#p246482</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[C910 vs QC9K?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246393/#p246393"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[I'm looking for a new webcam and Im wondering if the C910 is a better choice. How much better is the image quality(and I don't just mean resolution)? [u][b]If possible, I would greatly appreciate some photographic comparisons[/b][/u], as these are hard to come by.

Thank you.]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Aero_Studios]]></name>
				<uri>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/user/4501/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-05T19:50:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://bricksinmotion.com/forums/post/246393/#p246393</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
